cob709 wrote:KalegNar wrote:cob709 wrote:dolphina wrote:well i think you all are stupid fucks
/vote cob
Why do you think we're "stupid fucks"? I feel like that's something Mafia would say to pressure us into being submissive so that you can control the Town.
I shall not have my opinions oppressed.
/vote dolphina
Retaliating to having a vote put on you by voting the person that voted you? Seems like an OMGUS to me.
unvote lethologica
vote cob709
Why would you consider an OMGUS vote suspicious? As long as it's supported by information, it's completely valid.
This feels like a sneaky way to move your vote off of letho.
/vote KaleNar
//side-note: I'm now thinking of the quote-trees that may occur in-game. And as such I may have to reconsider my quoting styles.
//side-side-note: Hip hip hooray for the continuation of the pre-game game.
//side-side-side-note: Who is this KaleNar? I'm not related to Hipster Salad! There is a 'G' in my name! (Though ironically it did bring back some memories to the first game I used this IGN for where there were a couple people that'd consistently call me Kale because they played on pads/phones that had autocorrect.
I shall point out that initially your reasoning for going with a NoLynch was in order to wait for TIs to post information to avoid a myslynch. However when you OMGUSed Dolphina it was not based on any of the prior strong-conviction to the NoLynch that you were holding to. Rather it was for the same non-TI backed "guesses" you initially wanted to avoid prior to seeing if any such leads could be found.
In other words, something you initially stated as being not vote-worthy, by measure of you going with a NoLynch so early, suddenly became vote-worthy when you were voted. Ergo I defend my vote on you and the OMGUS reasoning. If it weren't for the initial NoLynch, I would agree on there being a better case for your retalitory vote. But in light of the initial NoLynch and later turn, I defend my vote on you.
And because I guess I need to do things chat-command style
/vote cob709