VFM70 | Manatees (pt. 2) | Game Over

[dota2reporter]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

[3cheersforidiots]

Is there any case on Poly?

their reads are sheepy and the rest of their posts are fluffy
I think they did recognise their posting as bad but didn't really make an attempt to improve on it

[3cheersforidiots]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

[dota2reporter]

Is there any case on Poly?

their reads are sheepy and the rest of their posts are fluffy
I think they did recognise their posting as bad but didn't really make an attempt to improve on it

sheeping is towny if it's obvious

if it's like, not obvious sheeping then yeah (for example voting someone who's been agreed on as the wagon)

[dota2reporter]

wait i meant "didnt you townread me tho"

[kosmo16]

Crimson is fine vote. I can't see a reason to scum/town read poly. Objection to hypoclaiming from Wabbit make me think he is Town. But that's weak. From Wabbit/poly I perfer poly.

/vote Crimson

[kosmo16]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

Wait. I may reconsider my read on Wabbit. What's the Sparking's case?

[SparkingJay]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

I wouldn't really call it a case, more of an analysis on you/Wabbit's associations.

[3cheersforidiots]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

Wait. I may reconsider my read on Wabbit. What's the Sparking's case?

#842

[Jabichuelas]

@Javi can I ask you to spesify (or rephrase) the line about me?

I said no one knows what you're doing because you're picking things to overanalyze that no one else is interested in to make it look like you're doing a lot of work, because no one else would deepen themselves into said things to be sure.

I think you're assuming we have the same context as you when you make a post but we're busy being focused with other stuff that we believe are more important. Why bother that much about a middle bracket, or very specific traits of 3cheers' writing? Even asking me about SFM72 feels somewhat like a forced interaction.

somehow I still doubt that you're scum because what if you're actually being genuine about all of this? (Sorry if you are.) That's probably going to change because of how little day we have left, but idk I got lost by being myself

if the "we" doesn't apply to someone here, say it, i wanna be sure
sorry if that was uncalled for, maybe im being small brain

TBH the middle bracket thing was Because it makes it impossible to comment on. Like Idk If my explanation was clear, but Seriously without a clear scheme of reads in readslists, it makes it just impossible to understand.
It's standart to not spesify it If amount of lines is odd but at even I just couldn't understand it.
For example, somebody made A readslists with 4 brackets ( Dont remember Who atm ). Okay, it is clear #1 is TRs some sort of, #4 is scumreads sort of, What's #2-3?
The 3cheers thing was, A Meta read I was holding Because thing I realized and I thought If they are scum clearing people from there might be very useful. Maybe I had better revealed it mid-Day, though I cannot see .
That SFM72 question was, I think I asked it shortly after you made A post about that game so I thought it may be A good idea to see your reaction from there.

I meant wabbit's middle bracket, about those reads of who checked in and who didn't, that whole discussion
if SFM72 was brought up earlier then fine, but it still felt too convenient to have
Also, maybe you should have been more cooperative with the rest of the town about the thing with 3cheers? The point here is that you did that all by yourself.

[3cheersforidiots]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

I wouldn't really call it a case, more of an analysis on you/Wabbit's associations.

okay, it's a case from me!pov, rather
from me!pov, it basically points out potential attempts from Wabbit to pocket me

[SparkingJay]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

Wait. I may reconsider my read on Wabbit. What's the Sparking's case?

Spoiler:

Wabbit/3cheers in Wabbits ISO:
- First 2 pages no interactions besides Wabbit keeping 3cheers as null
- 3rd page only association is calling an interaction between Hello/3cheers v/v
- 4th page nothing besides game unrelated talk and Wabbit talking about Uzay's vote on 3cheers.
What I find interesting is that they still had 3cheers as null yet didn't question why 3cheers was seen as a Top TR in Poly's readslist:
[spoiler]

{TheWabbit, Crimson97, 3cheersforidiots}
{kosmo16, Jabichuelas, lemonader666}
{dota2reporter, UzayAltay, ScarredSamurai}
{SparkingJayYT, cob709, HelloSither}

explain kosmo, scarred, sparking, and hellosither

- Later they jot 3cheers as a Townlean with no explanation

Rest of the iso is bland in terms of interactions, chances of w/w is very possible.
Tonewise to each other they were consistently casually talking

Dota what?
Wabbit's point was "Uzay didnt casted a vote"
I casted a vote
Like Okay Wabbit has an ego of 999/100 but You should have easily seen they're wrong.

my point's slightly different, i thought voting smilies instead of a player was playing a bit safe

That's what my vote encompasses? The entrance would've been fine with an RVS vote but not actually doing one while attempting to look like you're doing so makes it a terrible entrance.

Besides me not getting why anyone would be a pussy to lay down an RVS vote of all things,
why would you pretend to look like you are RVSing as scum when in reality you are aware that you aren't.

This is just reaching from what was only a joke vote.

[/spoiler]

[kosmo16]

/vote crimson yolo

this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE
thank you, dota

anything for you lads

the entire thread is frozen

I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.

think hello or poly.

CFD one of Crimson/dota?
or Wabbit, if you want

P-edit: hmm

didn't you townread tho
weird stuff

personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob
nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option

I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting

Wait. I may reconsider my read on Wabbit. What's the Sparking's case?

#842

OK, that proves that Sparking is Town.

I like that it provides follow-up. Sounds good.

/vote Wabbit

[3cheersforidiots]

also just had a quick skim of poly, and there was an ~aggressive townread on lemon there, and I do not like that

[UzayAltay]

Do We have a VC?

[3cheersforidiots]

Do We have a VC?

Sparking's makeshift VC implies there are 4 votes on Wabbit and 3 on poly (methinks)

[SparkingJay]

Do We have a VC?

Same as I posted only difference is Kosmo voting Wabbit I think

[UzayAltay]

Thx.
/vote poly

[SparkingJay]

Poly/Wabbit are topwagons yet they both aren't here due to timezones which is great.

[dota2reporter]

im certainly not voting poly
wabbit feels like a lazy wagon too but if i have to i'll vote

[SparkingJay]

@Uzay what swayed you to vote Poly?
Last page you seemed to be clueless on Poly.

[UzayAltay]

@Uzay what swayed you to vote Poly?
Last page you seemed to be clueless on Poly.

Better Than Wabbit
And their ISO seems dull, except general reads which they faked first for ???

[ManateeDude]

Current Vote Count

Player	Votes	Voters
	#	Votes Until Majority

Not Voting: cob709, HelloSither

[3cheersforidiots]

inb4 Manatee forgets my vote again and I'm paranoid
/vote poly

[ManateeDude]

Day 1 ends in