xUltiix wrote:Responses to all your responses in chronological order of what you wrote
1) Why?
2) not elaborating doesn't further gamestate more than elaborating. making people ask questions that should have been answered in the op does the exact opposite and hinders it.
3) the logic is established whether you agree or not, the example is fencesitting
4) same as 3
5) you can have this one
6) that's completely not what my point was
7) also not what my point was
1) because not taking a full look at someone iso doesnt give you a full look at them
2) exactly the opposite. by leaving something open and not complete makes someone else involved and more likely for them to remember and pay attention
also tests if other people even care about something in the first place. i assume everything else is fine with my response here?
3) the definition of fencesitting is there but my response is absolutely not. if saying that something is nai is instantly fencesitting then yikes, ive been fensesitting most of my games.
4) me refuting a bad metaread isnt fencesitting try again
5) i havent done anything to prove myself even why are you giving this one out of all of them lmao
6) your point is the same as the other points. ive broke several fences already in your eyes. you say its fencesitting and i say it is not.
7) ok but the read was explained later.too, i dont even get your point here. i state a hard opinion and you say i cant and have to explain it at the same time?? like look at the posts prior its pretty easy to understand why they are tvs and not svs