Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
Flake wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:Anyar wrote: they might as well leave as soon as they're in the grave instead of staying and potentially giving info to Meds out of spite.
And lose -15 elo for doing so.
You lose more Elo for quitting when dead even if your win chance is 0%?
If so that's stupid.
Atalanta8 wrote:Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
Or if more evil alive than town casue 3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
If you're NE who didn't complete their goal/NK and you're dead, your win chance is 0. It's not like Town or Mafia where you have a faction to pick up the game for you.Mikemk wrote:Your win chance is never 0.Flake wrote:You lose more Elo for quitting when dead even if your win chance is 0%?Atalanta8 wrote:And lose -15 elo for doing so.Anyar wrote: they might as well leave as soon as they're in the grave instead of staying and potentially giving info to Meds out of spite.
If so that's stupid.
Atalanta8 wrote:Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
Or if more evil alive than town casue 3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Flake wrote:long term effects do not offset the feeling of unfairness in the short term
Mikemk wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Seen it too. Just report them, at that point it's gamethrowing because they know you're on the same team.
Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
James2 wrote:Mikemk wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Seen it too. Just report them, at that point it's gamethrowing because they know you're on the same team.
Being salty about losing is, in addition to not being a valid reason for changing game mechanics, also not a valid reason for reporting the winning team.
Mikemk wrote:BasicFourLife wrote:You can start by getting rid of her Consig ability, it’s retarded for her to have it in the first place.
Actually, only consig ability would work better than only controlling, since she could find out who she wins with.
Flake wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:Anyar wrote: they might as well leave as soon as they're in the grave instead of staying and potentially giving info to Meds out of spite.
And lose -15 elo for doing so.
You lose more Elo for quitting when dead even if your win chance is 0%?
If so that's stupid.
Mikemk wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
Or if more evil alive than town casue 3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Seen it too. Just report them, at that point it's gamethrowing because they know you're on the same team.
Mikemk wrote:James2 wrote:Mikemk wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Seen it too. Just report them, at that point it's gamethrowing because they know you're on the same team.
Being salty about losing is, in addition to not being a valid reason for changing game mechanics, also not a valid reason for reporting the winning team.
The thing is, in this scenario, you're a part of the winning team, and yet still lose.
James2 wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
Or if more evil alive than town casue 3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Being salty about losing is not a valid reason for changing game mechanics.
Mikemk wrote:I thought you only lost max elo if you leave while alive.
Mikemk wrote:Flake wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:Anyar wrote: they might as well leave as soon as they're in the grave instead of staying and potentially giving info to Meds out of spite.
And lose -15 elo for doing so.
You lose more Elo for quitting when dead even if your win chance is 0%?
If so that's stupid.
Your win chance is never 0.
Mikemk wrote:James2 wrote:Mikemk wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Seen it too. Just report them, at that point it's gamethrowing because they know you're on the same team.
Being salty about losing is, in addition to not being a valid reason for changing game mechanics, also not a valid reason for reporting the winning team.
The thing is, in this scenario, you're a part of the winning team, and yet still lose.
Atalanta8 wrote:James2 wrote:Atalanta8 wrote:Mikemk wrote:The only witch change I would support is changing them so they win if they're alive when the last town dies, since at that point, they've literally fulfilled their win condition of "Live to see the town lose."
Or if more evil alive than town casue 3 maf 1 town, can still lynch witch for the "funsies." I've seen it happen. It's BS.
Being salty about losing is not a valid reason for changing game mechanics.
It's not being salty that you lost. It's being salty becasue in all sense and purposes you win but then some assholes decide that it'd be fun if you don't get to win after all because it doesn't effect their win. 100% this is a valid reason to change game mechanics. Lynching witch as "funsies" should at the very least be a report-able offense which results in a ban.
James2 wrote:If you can't secure your win via normal game mechanisms, then it's fair that you lose.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests