caralyn13 wrote:What would be the point of a briber if they win with everyone?
Also could you specify how they would control someones vote?
Jason13th wrote:It should be a Mafia member, not Neutral Evil.
Mace8937 wrote:can you give me some reasoning to why it should be Mafia?
Jason13th wrote:Mace8937 wrote:can you give me some reasoning to why it should be Mafia?
Why would it win with everyone else if it is Neutral Evil. It should be a Mafia member because it can prevent a Town member from voting.
Mace8937 wrote:Jason13th wrote:Mace8937 wrote:can you give me some reasoning to why it should be Mafia?
Why would it win with everyone else if it is Neutral Evil. It should be a Mafia member because it can prevent a Town member from voting.
Ok, I will implement those changes, but what alignment of Mafia?
Kirize12 wrote:It was perfectly fine as Neutral Evil.
Mace8937 wrote:Kirize12 wrote:It was perfectly fine as Neutral Evil.
Then I will change it back
Jason13th wrote:Mace8937 wrote:Kirize12 wrote:It was perfectly fine as Neutral Evil.
Then I will change it back
Mafia Support is better.
Kirize12 wrote:And maybe change the name.
Kirize12 wrote:Mace8937 wrote:Kirize12 wrote:And maybe change the name.
What name would you propose it be changed to?
Banker? Politician? Lobbyist? Governor? Ventriloquist?
MaccaMania wrote:I also think it should have the same goal as the Witch "Survive to see the Town lose the game."
RetralMega wrote:A role that changes another player's votes would fuck up the Trials system more than Disguising did for the longest time. We'd have no way to tell if the player voted for the revealed Mayor on their own, or was forced to.
RetralMega wrote:People could gamethrow with this role in play simply because we wouldn't know and have to either skip it or vote Innocent.
Mace8937 wrote:RetralMega wrote:A role that changes another player's votes would fuck up the Trials system more than Disguising did for the longest time. We'd have no way to tell if the player voted for the revealed Mayor on their own, or was forced to.
That's the whole point :/RetralMega wrote:People could gamethrow with this role in play simply because we wouldn't know and have to either skip it or vote Innocent.
well before people could report them smart people would probably realize if there was a NE role available, then they could be gamethrowing, or being controlled by a Politician. They wouldn't know for sure and hopefully would be smart enough to wait till the end of the game to see if there was a Politician or not.
RetralMega wrote:That's not what I'm saying. I'm guessing you've never done Trials, so you wouldn't understand.
Mace8937 wrote:RetralMega wrote:That's not what I'm saying. I'm guessing you've never done Trials, so you wouldn't understand.
Yes, I've never done a "trial". Can you tell me what it is?
RetralMega wrote:Mace8937 wrote:RetralMega wrote:That's not what I'm saying. I'm guessing you've never done Trials, so you wouldn't understand.
Yes, I've never done a "trial". Can you tell me what it is?
Actually, I can't. Not allowed to talk about it. First rule of fight club, you know?
RetralMega wrote:A notification saying someone was bribed at the start of the day would help, I suppose, but would be a big nerf.
MaccaMania wrote:I have always liked the idea of a reverse Blackmailer.
I agree that it should be kept in Neutral Evil though, as Mafia Support would make the Mafia too powerful, the same way the Witch would.
I also think it should have the same goal as the Witch "Survive to see the Town lose the game."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests