Not always, but there are definite times where it would've been in the exe's interest to side with mafia. I was a consort in a 3v3v1 situation where that "1" was an exe and their target was still alive. I was brought up on the stand and admitted to being mafia fully expecting the exe to inno and for us to vote up the exe's target instead. The exe decided to side with town against his own self interest and we lost as a result. It's possible the exe was lying about his target and simply made the arbitrary decision to side with town, but this happens often enough with NE's that I think that's unlikely.But exe's don't really have to work with maf.
KJYKJY1985 wrote:Not always, but there are definite times where it would've been in the exe's interest to side with mafia. I was a consort in a 3v3v1 situation where that "1" was an exe and their target was still alive. I was brought up on the stand and admitted to being mafia fully expecting the exe to inno and for us to vote up the exe's target instead. The exe decided to side with town against his own self interest and we lost as a result. It's possible the exe was lying about his target and simply made the arbitrary decision to side with town, but this happens often enough with NE's that I think that's unlikely.But exe's don't really have to work with maf.
I can think of at least two other times this has happened with a witch. One time, the witch was lucky enough to win with NK after killing two mafia members. You might think "What's the difference?" but there was no guarantee that the witch would've won with NK whereas if they'd sided with us, their victory would've been guaranteed. Another time I was playing as town and the witch actively helped us find a mafia member and lynch them. After the town's victory was assured, the witch actually said "Oh crap! I read my victory conditions wrong!"
I've also watched a series of youtube videos with a group of friends who are really bad at this game, and even after dozens of matches at least, some of them still thought that jester and exe won by surviving until the end of the game.
In some cases I can't get too angry, because it wouldn't have affected our strategy that much, but it would be nice to be able to expect the NE to act in their rational self interest.
I'd hate to jump down your throat over this, but people not thinking through the numbers is a real pet peeve of mine. In a 3v3v1 situation, mafia + exe = majority. There's no reason for the exe to assume the mafia won't cooperate and no reason not to try and lynch your target right then and there. Lynching a mafia would just make the situation 3v2v1, which would make the lynch impossible and doubly so if the jailor kills a mafia that night. If mafia manages to kill that night, there's a 1/3 chance of them killing the exes target. If all of the mafia survive the night and manage to kill a townie other than the exe's target, the situation is 2v2v1, which is almost the exact same situation. Besides, the exe had already outed themself by that point, hence how I knew.But there is nothing wrong with this play. Could be that exe want to be seen as town to get their targets lynched easier. Or just get jailor suspicion off his back. That's actually a decent strategy and much better play than siding with maf when person thats on the trial is already very suspicious. Maf might just decide not to help exe too, so he has no guarantee at all if he inno's maf.
TarpleyHitt wrote:NE wins with evils but NE needs to put the Mafia in a position where they are forced to work with them or lose. Mafia can easily backstab the witch after parity
You must have exe confused with survivor. Exe's goal is to lynch a member of the town, which they need the mafia's help with in a 3v3v1 situation. I have actually lost at least one match that I can think of because the exe wanted to vote with the town for some reason in a 3v3v1 situation rather than vote up his target. In making the mafia lose, he ended up losing the game himself in the process. This thread isn't about the mafia being "owed" anything by the NE. It's about wanting to expect NE to act in their rational self interest.if it WAS exe then it his choice to chose who win with and so blame him for that is really being a pathetic dick
KJYKJY1985 wrote:You must have exe confused with survivor. Exe's goal is to lynch a member of the town, which they need the mafia's help with in a 3v3v1 situation. I have actually lost at least one match that I can think of because the exe wanted to vote with the town for some reason in a 3v3v1 situation rather than vote up his target. In making the mafia lose, he ended up losing the game himself in the process. This thread isn't about the mafia being "owed" anything by the NE. It's about wanting to expect NE to act in their rational self interest.if it WAS exe then it his choice to chose who win with and so blame him for that is really being a pathetic dick
Firestorm wrote:"When you put a bunch of broken pieces together in the right way, suddenly they don't seem so broken anymore."
Professor Farnsworth wrote:"Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything."
Return to Town of Salem Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests