Robbytherobot wrote:Any thing that undermines medium has got to go including dead taunts
Descender wrote:the medium role
should not exist in the first place
Descender wrote:you do know how bad a concept medium is right
Superalex11 wrote:Descender wrote:the medium role
should not exist in the first placeDescender wrote:you do know how bad a concept medium is right
Well this isn't a balance thread, so these points are irrelevant.
Descender wrote:if you are willing to have alive-dead interactions pay-for taunts are ok too
Superalex11 wrote:Descender wrote:if you are willing to have alive-dead interactions pay-for taunts are ok too
Well I don't believe this claim is true, so you're going to have to qualify it.
You also seem to keep ignoring the point I'm making about how taunts are based externally, whereas other interactions aren't (e.g. medium's ability).
shapesifter13 wrote:
Taunts*:
I totally understand how seeing taunts to cause valid lynches, or mislynches could be problematic. We are not opposed to a taunt change, but they would very likely never be removed. One suggestion I saw was letting dead players taunts only be seen by other dead players. This was the best suggestion I saw, and I'll bring it up with the team, and see what the thoughts are. This is something we have brought up a couple times, but never pulled the trigger on because Unity has taken up nearly all of our time. I am also open to more feedback on solutions.
KAKERMAN23 wrote:I'd imagine the living could taunt someone who the dead had already taunted.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests