Kirize12 wrote:I'll allow it, everyone's doing it so I might as well.
It's not like your role has competed yet anyways.
Spectre0 wrote:Studies show that actually thinking about a role idea before you post it increases the average quality of your posts by approximately one fuck-ton.
darkabsol wrote:That makes sense when you use logic, but you're forgetting that people in ToS don't have more than half a brain cell.
Blaze116 wrote:Don't make any sorta poll with two yes options. It's just pointless because everyone who says no will click the bottom yes.
I support the role, not the poll.
Kirize12 wrote:Blaze116 wrote:Don't make any sorta poll with two yes options. It's just pointless because everyone who says no will click the bottom yes.
I support the role, not the poll.
It's not a poll, it's a petition.
cxl1024 wrote:Kirize12 wrote:Blaze116 wrote:Don't make any sorta poll with two yes options. It's just pointless because everyone who says no will click the bottom yes.
I support the role, not the poll.
It's not a poll, it's a petition.
Yeah but the title of the poll is a question so it's a little misleading. Hilary and Donald don't go around asking "Should I be voted for?" lol...
Mace, can you change it to "Vote to put this in the game."
ReEvolve wrote:I think this should be added however does it mean that if it is just you and one other person you can bribe them to vote against themselves?
Cenas4life wrote:This role sounds quite interesting. I would however suggest making it a mafia role instead of a neutral role as I think that way it would be more effective. Since I overall like it though, /Support
Mace8937 wrote:Cenas4life wrote:This role sounds quite interesting. I would however suggest making it a mafia role instead of a neutral role as I think that way it would be more effective. Since I overall like it though, /Support
There's an argument about that on the first page. You could check it out and find out why it's better as Neutral Evil. If you still disagree with it being Neutral, I'll be here to agree to disagree.
Dylan6249 wrote:This is a role that is confirmed to be in the card game. So maybe it will also be in the main game
http://cdn.crowdfundinsider.com/wp-cont ... alem-2.jpg
Dylan6249 wrote:This is a role that is confirmed to be in the card game. So maybe it will also be in the main game
http://cdn.crowdfundinsider.com/wp-cont ... alem-2.jpg
Skulomania wrote:The Politician is definitely better as Neutral Evil. With the quite uneventful and lacking NE roles currently in the game, i think this is an NE role that is quite needed in the game.
Most roles on the role-thread are good/fair, but only a few are actually needed and should be implemented in the game. This is one of those roles.
Drackzgull wrote:Excelent role idea, definitely should be added to game. I have just one small suggestion:
If you are forced to target yourself, the ability should just fail, because:
- You are already using the Neutral Evil slot, the presence of a Witch is quite unlikely. (in ranked)
- If there is a Witch anyway, they will almost never make you target yourself. Why would they ever unless just randomly and just once?
- If it was a Transporter that messed you up, then the Transporter did his job, and it's fair that they get you to fail.
- Conceptually it makes no sense to bribe yourself, your money is still your money. It makes even less sense to gain voting power from that.
Other than that this is pure perfection. /Support
Mace8937 wrote:Drackzgull wrote:Excelent role idea, definitely should be added to game. I have just one small suggestion:
If you are forced to target yourself, the ability should just fail, because:
- You are already using the Neutral Evil slot, the presence of a Witch is quite unlikely. (in ranked)
- If there is a Witch anyway, they will almost never make you target yourself. Why would they ever unless just randomly and just once?
- If it was a Transporter that messed you up, then the Transporter did his job, and it's fair that they get you to fail.
- Conceptually it makes no sense to bribe yourself, your money is still your money. It makes even less sense to gain voting power from that.
Other than that this is pure perfection. /Support
Witch: Witch would make you target yourself in case you're Jailor to execute whoever you are jailing. Make you kill yourself, if you have no NI and are able to kill. Arso to ignite. Werewolf to stay at home. etc. There's alot of people who do this if you might be one of these roles.
Last point: Balance > Lore
Drackzgull wrote:Mace8937 wrote:Drackzgull wrote:Excelent role idea, definitely should be added to game. I have just one small suggestion:
If you are forced to target yourself, the ability should just fail, because:
- You are already using the Neutral Evil slot, the presence of a Witch is quite unlikely. (in ranked)
- If there is a Witch anyway, they will almost never make you target yourself. Why would they ever unless just randomly and just once?
- If it was a Transporter that messed you up, then the Transporter did his job, and it's fair that they get you to fail.
- Conceptually it makes no sense to bribe yourself, your money is still your money. It makes even less sense to gain voting power from that.
Other than that this is pure perfection. /Support
Witch: Witch would make you target yourself in case you're Jailor to execute whoever you are jailing. Make you kill yourself, if you have no NI and are able to kill. Arso to ignite. Werewolf to stay at home. etc. There's alot of people who do this if you might be one of these roles.
Last point: Balance > Lore
- Forcing a Werewolf to stay home is suicide, they will kill all visitors and the Witch will be one of them.
Balance > Lore indeed, but Lore still gets a little consideration after balance has been argumented, and I have.
Mace8937 wrote: Spoiler:
(Just going to focus on these two points)
1. Suiciding might be worth it to get rid of a few important Townies. But it be gamethrowing, considering you have to survive to the end of the game. Then again, you are killing Townies, which is towards your wincon. But I agree, it's a stupid strategy. Unless you got outed after voting the previous day, and were going to die anyway.
2. However, Lore should not affect the Balance of a role.
Drackzgull wrote:Mace8937 wrote: Spoiler:
(Just going to focus on these two points)
1. Suiciding might be worth it to get rid of a few important Townies. But it be gamethrowing, considering you have to survive to the end of the game. Then again, you are killing Townies, which is towards your wincon. But I agree, it's a stupid strategy. Unless you got outed after voting the previous day, and were going to die anyway.
2. However, Lore should not affect the Balance of a role.
You are correct on both points. However the lore is not what I'm arguing. I'm arguing that I believe, for reasons I have explained, that when the Politician's ability is forced to be targeted on himself, making the ability fail is a more balanced solution than it's current state. The lore just so happens to agree with my posture.
Mace8937 wrote: Spoiler:
However, why would the Politician not be able to do his ability when Witched/Transported to himself when other roles can?
Killing, going on alert, checking if vampire (useless, but still happens), blackmailing, cleaning, etc.
It seems unfair if the Politician is targeted to himself and it does nothing, when other roles have to deal with the consequences/time wasting of targeting themselves.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests