frop418 wrote:FMLSheWas12 wrote:frop418 wrote:What do you guys find scummy about Sevo?
What do you think of S0me0ne's opinion on Sevo?
He pointed a lot of interesting points.
Kirize12 wrote:Let Framer trick it. It buffs it.
TheWolfBuddy wrote:Lore wise I have no clue why papers would mess up skin/hair/whatever samples or people saying who the person hangs out with or whatever.
Balance-wise?
Framer is awful and needs something more to do. Leave framer as is.
BPsycho2 wrote:So, Framer should fool this Scientist TWICE with one successfull frame?
Honestly, I think it should just fail.
tjpc3 wrote:I like the role and the idea. I had a similar idea a while ago where instead of alignments, it was based off of whether that player could win with the other player still alive. Which could be useful as a nerf.
For example you roll a scientist
n1 - sample a mayor - no result
n2 - sample a survivor - result of can win with eachother alive
n3 - sample a mafioso - result of can win with eachother alive
d3 - mayor reveals - you think the people you invested n2 and n3 are inno because of mayor
With this nerf implemented, the scientists results could also be unaffected by framers.
With this a scientist could also find jesters like so:
n1 - jester - no result
n2 - jester - can't win with this person alive
Roles like exe can win with everyone alive except their target.
IndiguanaYT wrote:An interesting idea, however it would need testing as it would require a lot of concentration and skill to use it effectively. If approved, maybe it should remain in only custom games and ranked? I can see it confusing a lot of people if it was to be included in ranked practice.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests