Kiyosen wrote:MAFIA Y U NO KILL MILTE BEFORE YOU DIE?!
Because they wanted to kill me....
And tbh, I didn't know you doused me....
Kiyosen wrote:MAFIA Y U NO KILL MILTE BEFORE YOU DIE?!
Kiyosen wrote:MAFIA Y U NO KILL MILTE BEFORE YOU DIE?!
Bloodringe wrote:Alright so success... What I learned, Afk is my enemy. Also I need to work more. That about suns it up, thank you to everyone who participated. The priest, I'm pretty sure the priest caused some confusion regarding Kiyosen. So not a great result, but something to think about. All in all, again thank you to everyone it was rough but its coming together more and more.
I'm 90% sure I sent saying you were doused. If I didn't, I know I made mistakes. Could have been tons more I assure you.
Kiyo-Kitten attacked, then said no attack, then attacked. The time ended on the second.
milte345 wrote:I'm still kinda facepalming about parkers lynch
Since I had just said they weren't even online
*sigh*
murat1996 wrote:milte345 wrote:I'm still kinda facepalming about parkers lynch
Since I had just said they weren't even online
*sigh*
Why didn't Parker commit then?
Bloodringe wrote:Well, I'm going to go pass out. I'll leave this open for a bit, seems like things are dying out. I'll lock it and archive it there after. But yeah, night 2 I thought town was boned. Night 3 I thought mafia would win, night 4 I was doing the Mario party(You know, when you see exactly what needs to happen to every player for someone to win. I can't be the only one) and was excited for Kiyo but Milte and Komo were not fooled.
About parker-at the start she hard claimed survivor. So I thought she was just playing terrible silent survivor, and once on trial it would have been pointless to being her down to have her die at the end of the night(Not to mention corralling everyone to explain that)
Bloodringe wrote:Hopefully the council will help decide that(things got busy lately) It might be this one, but I doubt it. Not because we wont test it again. In fact we didn't even have a list with a werewolf. Which at some point should be tested for the intimidation element. But I go on, Next game wont be Sunday, yes I have another setup all ready and waiting but the amount of people not so much. The next role will likely be something other than the priest for variety as well as pace . I'll be spending Sunday analyzing this round and the role. The next one will be determined tonight most likely.
bumblecow wrote:Hey blood can I host the next one?
Bloodringe wrote:bumblecow wrote:Hey blood can I host the next one?
Let me get back to you on that, I'm working on to preliminary things for new hosts. 1-Being a sub host to some game, so the understanding of what a sub host does(and therefore what you would be asking a sub host to do) will develop. I will say, I think 2 sub hosts might be minimum. One for external chats, one for whispers. At least for me, being mobile and everything. And yes, I did just host that entire game(With a generous amount of help with links and ex chat from Isrlygood) on my phone.
2-Host an unarchived miniround with 2-5 players. I'll play in those.
We wouldn't want things to go wrong during a an archived test.
bumblecow wrote:Bloodringe wrote:bumblecow wrote:Hey blood can I host the next one?
Let me get back to you on that, I'm working on to preliminary things for new hosts. 1-Being a sub host to some game, so the understanding of what a sub host does(and therefore what you would be asking a sub host to do) will develop. I will say, I think 2 sub hosts might be minimum. One for external chats, one for whispers. At least for me, being mobile and everything. And yes, I did just host that entire game(With a generous amount of help with links and ex chat from Isrlygood) on my phone.
2-Host an unarchived miniround with 2-5 players. I'll play in those.
We wouldn't want things to go wrong during a an archived test.
Well I'll do all the things that are on that list.
bumblecow wrote:Hey blood can I host the next one?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests