Just from this website alone, you can get that there are over 250 people with that surname. Not 8 in total, so that's a lie, you argue just to be difficult and not to resolve an issue.
https://www.familysearch.org/en/surname ... e=HillerinAnd that is not even counting other websites or doing more digging than a 5 second long google search. If I tried hard enough with enough given time, I'd probably even be able to list you triple the amount, but by then I presume my punishment would be over by the time I'm done.
Again, why is Hillerin not allowed but Nick Kerr allowed? What's the difference? You never explained it other than one is popular, and the other is not.
"you have not once used the name "Adolf Blueberin", or any name with "Adolf" in it to begin with."
If you have access to all the games that I played, then you would be easily able to point out that very often I call myself Adolf Blueberin. Again, it is fallacious to claim that just because I was never called Blueberin in those reports I never or rarely call myself that—those reports only represent a tiny fraction of my games. Almost meaningless when compared with the rest… Actually, after checking my reports, I can confirm at least 2 reports where I call myself that, so that's already 25% of all reported games, and it already proves I called myself that multiple times, here they are:
https://www.blankmediagames.com/Trial/v ... id=3518649,
https://www.blankmediagames.com/Trial/v ... id=3519261 (all innos too)
EDIT: That's actually a single game that I got reported twice for. Still, this proves that I still used 'Adolf Blueberin' in a game, which aligns with my claims.
I can't find a report where I said the things and named myself things in the pictures you showed me, so perhaps you have access to all of my games? If that is so, you can easily check whether I call myself Adolf Blueberin in other games than those brought up.
As for the first photo, I don't see any rules broken here. I never did any racism in that lobby, I never joked about any races. I did tell someone to call themselves the N word to prove that they are badass, although is posting that challenge against the rules when I myself haven't actually even called myself that and that this challenge itself doesn't even have any racism in it by default? And only the answer to this challenge could? Unless, of course, the second party would call themselves the N word then I could probably see myself being the catalyst for it, so I guess I could see a reason to punish me there—but that didn't happen, so.
As for the second photo, You probably believe that it's correlated with my previous comment on Racism. You probably think that White Powder meant 'White Power'. White Powder literally meant the white powder as of… Cocaine, but I guess that's not really much better and still kind of edgy, so point given.
"there is a big difference between using a name of someone who is a very well known former NBA player, and a name that you claim exists to suit your argument of it not being a filter evasion."
OK, What's the difference between using a name of someone popular and someone who is not as popular? The only difference I can see here is the popularity one. Should popularity decide whether I should be guilty or innocent? Because I can't see any other reason, and I await your enlightenment.