by grootBroot » Mon Apr 22, 2019 3:37 am
Nice. Does it have any relevance to this case? No. Don't call everything you disagree with hate speech, ok? It makes you look like a troll.
But since you somehow got that green name, I will adress your claim:
- My speech was not abusive. The things the triggered people said to me (Burn in Hell, suffer forever, get killed) were, though.
- My speech was not threatening. The things the triggered people said to me (See above) were, though.
- My speech did not express prejudice against a particular group. The other people, did, though, by using slurs like 'Wicked Gay' and 'Immoral Atheist'.
- My speech was not based on race.
- My speech was adressed against religion, that's correct. But since it was no hate speech, it's ok. We have no Sharia here and being critical of religion is not prohibited nor blaspehmy, yet. On the other hand, they were showing prejudice against people based on a lack of religion. Not me.
- My speech was not adressed against sexual orientation. It's ok to be gay. Unfortunately, the homophobic reports didn't think the same way and viewed it as an insult. Why? Because they are homophobes. So, they were showing prejudice against people based on sexual orientation. Not me.
Next time, please check your facts before throwing around accusations.