Town of Salem Game Forums

joefischerxxx wrote:

Shilster wrote:So this is an easier version of Executioner that can kill by itself.

An Executioner is given the name of the person they have to get lynched, an Assassin is given a random non-unique town role and has to kill a person that has that role with only one chance to do so. It's a different concept

Don’t Lison To Shilster or even Lemonader, They Trash At Scum

They don’t know how to Play Exe/Jester Properly

And their so easy to Scum read as Mafia/Coven/NK

Also This Role is Epic! Would be super fun in Custom!

/Support

Seththeking wrote:

joefischerxxx wrote:

Shilster wrote:So this is an easier version of Executioner that can kill by itself.

An Executioner is given the name of the person they have to get lynched, an Assassin is given a random non-unique town role and has to kill a person that has that role with only one chance to do so. It's a different concept

Don’t Lison To Shilster or even Lemonader, They Trash At Scum

They don’t know how to Play Exe/Jester Properly

And their so easy to Scum read as Mafia/Coven/NK

Also This Role is Epic! Would be super fun in Custom!

/Support

Haha thanks man

TrueGuardian32 wrote:You could give it a special death message.

The Assassin was killed by the one who hired them for failing.

Or something like that.

Yeahhhhhhhh I like that idea

I added a link to a picture I made of the Assassin for fun.

Your target has Weapons (Or whatever it says) They could be a Vigilante, Veteran, Mafioso, Pirate, Ambusher or Assassin

Seththeking wrote:Your target has Weapons (Or whatever it says) They could be a Vigilante, Veteran, Mafioso, Pirate, Ambusher or Assassin

Too many results :/
We might need to add a new Tree to the game if we are going to keep doing these roles.

TrueGuardian32 wrote:

Seththeking wrote:Your target has Weapons (Or whatever it says) They could be a Vigilante, Veteran, Mafioso, Pirate, Ambusher or Assassin

Too many results :/
We might need to add a new Tree to the game if we are going to keep doing these roles.

Yeah

Really like this one ! has a bounty hunter feel

Neutral Evils should not be able to kill directly but give the chance to be able to.
Like Witch, it can't really kill unless it finds a Vigilante and forces them to shoot a Townie..

oOYuuArtSuiOo wrote:Neutral Evils should not be able to kill directly but give the chance to be able to.
Like Witch, it can't really kill unless it finds a Vigilante and forces them to shoot a Townie..

True, but I think NE is the closest fitting alignment to this, like its definitely not NB or NK, and its not different enough to be NC

oOYuuArtSuiOo wrote:Neutral Evils should not be able to kill directly but give the chance to be able to.
Like Witch, it can't really kill unless it finds a Vigilante and forces them to shoot a Townie..

However, it fits more with NE since it gets a town target to kill. And you know Jester can kill somebody after they win so what's the difference?

Roles that suicide because they failed to do their ability is discouraged.

Ijust thought of all the investigative results and the one that makes the most sense to me is

Your target owns a gun. They must be a Vigilante, Veteran, Mafioso, Assassin. Nevermind

Also they are WAY TOO MANY achievements with just "assassinate a different target"
Remove like 2 - 5 of those.
For example the Transporter, Doctor, Vampire Hunter, Spy, and the Lookout ones, because they are the most dumbest ones.

BasicFourLife wrote:Ijust thought of all the investigative results and the one that makes the most sense to me is

Your target owns a gun. They must be a Vigilante, Veteran, Mafioso, Assassin. Nevermind

Also they are WAY TOO MANY achievements with just "assassinate a different target"
Remove like 2 - 5 of those.
For example the Transporter, Doctor, Vampire Hunter, Spy, and the Lookout ones, because they are the most dumbest ones.

lol i took um out

I'm planning on resubmitting this to the TG polls, anyone have any improvements they think should be made?

RevengeoftheRaccoon wrote:NE shouldn't kill by itself, away of that, i'm ok. That necrobump though...

It's only one kill though, even though it's a direct kill I don't think that it should be too big of a problem. What if the Assassin only attacked if they targeted the correct role? Then if they make the wrong choice they wouldn't attack the person.

Blayzeatron wrote:Honestly I think this role has a decent a mount of potential. I think that becoming a jester is better, because otherwise the role changes from NE to NB.

Jester is still neutral evil

/support

This role is sexy

This is nice I like this role.

Edit: It will also make VFR a bit weaker, and people claiming a role. Since if there is an assassin you mabye don't want to claim your role. So it change this meta which is a good thing.

great idea, but i think he should have higher attack, maybe unstoppable.

I think if you kill the wrong person, you should become a veteran with no alerts, or a survivor with no vests, instead of just flat out death, your target could have been transported that night, also, what happens if your target has defense? like a SK or GF?

BrainDeadRaven378 wrote:I think if you kill the wrong person, you should become a veteran with no alerts, or a survivor with no vests, instead of just flat out death, your target could have been transported that night, also, what happens if your target has defense? like a SK or GF?

Vet with no alert? Then it would change from neutral to town! Surv with no vests maybe, but still then it would change from NE to NB, unless you think this should be NB.

Right now your target can only be a member of the town, so it won't have a defense. If you attack someone with a defense you wouldn't kill them.

doublepuppy6 wrote:great idea, but i think he should have higher attack, maybe unstoppable.

A higher attack means this would be able to kill GFs or NKs, which I think would be a bit unfair to them, considering the Assassin's target would only be a town member.