Jackparrot wrote:Dear supporters of this petition,i would like to point out that, NEs shouldnt exist as according to parallex as all of them potentailly help the town yes all three of them!
EX1: exe tries to get target lynched, dies the next night and boom! confirmed townie and less people to put suspicion on, there fore hindering the oposition.
EX2: Witch attempts to use escort on "doc" when in fact he was SK with LO on him! (effectivly confirmed SK(confirmed town is bad but confirmed
scum is game-destroying))
EX3 (Parallex's example)
So by this logic NE doesnt exist! it's killing NB!
Joacgroso wrote:First of all, why there isn't a "no" option in the poll? You should add it.
Personally, I like jesters as they are now. Also, as the person above said, 4 pranks is too much. It should only have 2 or 3. Also, jesters should lose if they are executed by the jailor. This would make every evil role act like a jester, which is not funny. Town should have at least 1 way of killing him without being punished.
And personally, I think that this could be a new role, but it would be better if jester stayed as they are now.
Jackparrot wrote:Dear supporters of this petition,i would like to point out that, NEs shouldnt exist as according to parallex as all of them potentailly help the town yes all three of them!
EX1: exe tries to get target lynched, dies the next night and boom! confirmed townie and less people to put suspicion on, there fore hindering the oposition.
EX2: Witch attempts to use escort on "doc" when in fact he was SK with LO on him! (effectivly confirmed SK(confirmed town is bad but confirmed
scum is game-destroying))
EX3 (Parallex's example)
So by this logic NE doesnt exist! it's killing NB!
ICECLIMBERS wrote:Stop acting like a ringleader bigot, goose.
Schultz128 wrote:No.
Also, amazing poll with the always hilarious "lol we put yes as the only option xd"
lemonader666 wrote:Schultz128 wrote:No.
Also, amazing poll with the always hilarious "lol we put yes as the only option xd"
Only plays FM and doesn't even gives reason ^
Also why would anyone say no if it's a petition
JGaming08 wrote:Plus, Jester prevents random lynching yeah, but it can harm Town roles as much as evils, in my opinion.
Schultz128 wrote:Changing it to Neutral Benign is fine, changing how jester works entirely is pointless.
Schultz128 wrote:Neutral Benign is a role that can win with any alignment.
Hence, Jester.
JGaming08 wrote:Amnesiac can turn into a role that kills every night.
Survivors can decide the fates of certain games by lynching.
Guardian Angel is biased towards a certain faction.
You tell me if NB is a 'friendly' alignment.
DeadLittleLamb wrote:Jackparrot wrote:The current jester is fun and balenced, while this is odd and could be a different role, i would not like to see jester changed.
Current Jester is swingy and does not fit the Neutral Evil alignment, it also encourages being scummy which is bad.
EvilPudding wrote:Interesting idea and it is balanced like the WW
/support
EvilPudding wrote:Interesting idea and it is balanced like the WW
/support
Blackwolfe99 wrote:By that same logic,the Witch is an issue too since they can control a killer or vampire to kill other evils and on more than one occasion.
HereThereEverywhere wrote:Blackwolfe99 wrote:By that same logic,the Witch is an issue too since they can control a killer or vampire to kill other evils and on more than one occasion.
Yeah, a bad Witch controls killers or Vampires more than once. A good Jester or a bad Jester, either one can easily kill evils. A good Witch isn't controlling killers or really any evil unless they want that evil to lose. So no, it's not the same.
EvilPudding wrote:Interesting idea and it is balanced like the WW
/support
HereThereEverywhere wrote:The problem is that it's too easy to lynch a Jester. Someone acting scummy and it's obvious they're going to be lynched? Evils aren't going to abstain in case they get called evil as well. It's not their fault it just happens to be a Jester.
EvilPudding wrote:Interesting idea and it is balanced like the WW
/support
HereThereEverywhere wrote:The problem is that it's too easy to lynch a Jester. Someone acting scummy and it's obvious they're going to be lynched? Evils aren't going to abstain in case they get called evil as well. It's not their fault it just happens to be a Jester.
RHCube wrote:HereThereEverywhere wrote:The problem is that it's too easy to lynch a Jester. Someone acting scummy and it's obvious they're going to be lynched? Evils aren't going to abstain in case they get called evil as well. It's not their fault it just happens to be a Jester.
It's also easy to tell if someone is a jester. If someone is acting like a jester, then you should just wait for the vig/jailor to kill them instead of lynching them.
EvilPudding wrote:Interesting idea and it is balanced like the WW
/support
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests