MarsGodofWar wrote:cob709 wrote:MarsGodofWar wrote:cob709 wrote:MarsGodofWar wrote:cob709 wrote:MarsGodofWar wrote:cob709 wrote:MarsGodofWar wrote:because transport is the second action with highest priority in the game, so roleblocks occurs AFTER the transport, u transed urself and giles corey, esc tried to rb giles corey, u get rbed, no transport occurs, but then u were never rbed
Simple solutation, make role blocking a higher priority. If you get roleblocked the transport never happens.
What if they're transported into the roleblock?
In that case, they get roleblocked so the transport never happens. But if the transport never happens, they never get roleblocked, which means the transport does happen. But if they transport does happen, then the Transporter gets roleblock and thus the transport never happens. But if the transport never happened then they would never have been roleblocked, meaning the transport does happen. But if they transport does happen, then the Transporter gets roleblock and thus the transport never happens. But if the transport never happened then they would never have been roleblocked, meaning the transport does happen. But if they transport does happen, then the Transporter gets roleblock and thus the transport never happens. But if the transport never happened then they would never have been roleblocked, meaning the transport does happen. But if they transport does happen, then the Transporter gets roleblock and thus the transport never happens. But if the transport never happened then they would never have been roleblocked, meaning the transport does happen.
You all keep makings things sound like they are complicated when there not. There's no paradoxes between Hookers and Cheuffers, this isn't bloody time travelling. If you were role blocked directly then the transport wouldn't occur. If you were transported into a roleblock, then it would happen. Its honestly quite simple to understand, but you all keep making it out like people are dumb. Transporters being role block immune was implemented because BMG was to lazy to install the mechanics for them to be role blocked.
Anyway, like I've asked dolphina. Please refrain yourself from posting filler. Absolutely no reason to repeat yourself like that
But if they transport themselves into the roleblock, then they would not transport themselves into the roleblock because they were roleblocked. But this contradicts itself, because if they didn't transport themselves into the roleblock, then they would transport themselves into the roleblock because they weren't roleblocked. What would happen? Who gets roleblocked?
You're just repeating yourself again. Are you dumb? Honestly, its not that bloody hard to understand. There's no paradox to it, so stop making it out like there is. ITS A FUCKING TAXI DRIVER!!! You're not going back in time and killing your grandparents. The role block would only occur IF YOU WERE DIRECTLY targeted. Nothing about what I've suggested contradicts itself in any way, you just seem to have trouble understanding more advanced mechanics.
So instead of Transporter being Escort immune, the Escort becomes Transporter immune?
Bro can you fuck off? You are absolutely fucking stupid. Stop putting words into my mouth. Not once did I say that an Escort would be immune to Transports, so I don't understand how you pulled that idea out of your ass.
Then who gets roleblocked? The Transporter or their target? Transporter would only be roleblocked if they were DIRECTLY targetted.
This change would be difficult and confusing to implement and understand. Players will get confused.
It's really not that confusing bud, give people credit. How hard is it to understand that a Transporter can get roleblocked? It's not, the only one confused here is you and sjdfjfjdfsjdf or whatever his fucking name is. It's more logical and makes more sense what I've suggested. Currently the game has way too many flawed mechanics.
What does directly being roleblocked mean to you? We seem to have different definitions of direct and indirect.