Two Vigilante Changes Ideas

[Boredfan1]

GO back and read my fucking posts! I have adressed like three fucking times!

You have rambled about this point several times, but you haven't actually made a good argument against it.

I don't think a good argument against this point is even possible. It's a good point: Don't punish the Vigilante for being right.

So it isn't so much punishing the vigilante for being right, it's a balancing feature and when a role comes up with a town role, it makes sense for the vigilante to commit suicide because if they don't commit suicide by killing a disguised disguiser, then that conveys important information

That isn't a counterpoint, that's trying to ignore the point we're making and emphasize your own unrelated point.

You CAN'T READ! I have gone IN DEPTH on BOTH a few times! Seriously, if you are going to keep going like this, just go away! You aren't contributing anything!

[Brilliand]

Seriously, if you are going to keep going like this, just go away! You aren't contributing anything!

You came here to make a proposal to the rest of us. Who did you think you were talking to when you wrote the OP?

[dolphina]

So no, it's not really about punishing the town for making right plays, it's punishing the town for not being super careful and calculated which, still leads to town winning most of the time and making the disguiser useful.

Except it is punishing Town for making the right plays

GO back and read my f*cking posts! I have adressed like three f*cking times! If you aren't going to read my replies, why the f*ck did you even step into the conversation?! And no, the town DOESN'T always play right and kill the disguiser, very commonly they get f*cking lucky and typically make r*tarded moves. This is a NEEDED change. Go back and read my replies.

Quick suggestion: try to make a smart counterpoint instead of trying to curse and scare me into agreeing