Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:the reason why people think it is weak is because they treat it as a cop rather than a doc
no, it's weak, because it's very situational, while sheriff and invest can give results every night.
And it's not doc, it can work as pseudo TP, when outed, but that's it, lookout have no power to save someone, just to redirect kill on someone less important
ZoruaLuhansk wrote:From this episode I learned that to win you need to catch all scum and not just deathtunnel one
ZoruaLuhansk wrote:From this episode I learned that to win you need to catch all scum and not just deathtunnel one
EvanManManMan wrote:UzayAltay wrote:Tardis in Mafia Chat wrote:
Also I agree to a lucky witch Scenario. Do considering you alredy checked them and they appeared as citi. I'm thinking slightly it could be Uzay as it appears he's under the radar slightly. However, wouldn't it better to lynch Jamez as "Consort" as we can still be stopped by him. He's convinced Schultz is Consig so he may get blocked I think.
Also, going through my maths, we need six majority tomorrow, one more kill the evils and town are locked in a stalemate right?Evan is Mafia Chat wrote:Town is in MyLo right now.
Uzay is super easy to read based ob meta and he is town.
Lynching Jamez is the optimal play in every universe. I can pin him as scum from Ultiix interactions as well. If Jamez is somehow undoable I'll advocate Lucky
:think:
The last few scum games I saw you play you slanked and were easy to catch. My perspective of you has definitely shifted based on this game.
Exacerbated wrote:uzay what is your first language
Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:the reason why people think it is weak is because they treat it as a cop rather than a doc
no, it's weak, because it's very situational, while sheriff and invest can give results every night.
And it's not doc, it can work as pseudo TP, when outed, but that's it, lookout have no power to save someone, just to redirect kill on someone less important
1 for 1 better than saving someone
Santa07 wrote:Schultz128 wrote:Like I love you and all Santa but you seriously did not do a good job with hosting this episode.
That I have realised, which is why the title is probably going to hold (at least for a good while)
RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:the reason why people think it is weak is because they treat it as a cop rather than a doc
no, it's weak, because it's very situational, while sheriff and invest can give results every night.
And it's not doc, it can work as pseudo TP, when outed, but that's it, lookout have no power to save someone, just to redirect kill on someone less important
1 for 1 better than saving someone
so, now lookout becomes bg?
if there's TP allive, it's pseudo TP - scum will be scared to kill important people, without TPs it's bodydouble at best - scum just kills lookout. To go 1 for 1 you need guess "safe" kill, but then we in WIFOM zone - what if scum kills someone you supposed to protect on assumption you're WIFOMing?
ZoruaLuhansk wrote:From this episode I learned that to win you need to catch all scum and not just deathtunnel one
Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:the reason why people think it is weak is because they treat it as a cop rather than a doc
no, it's weak, because it's very situational, while sheriff and invest can give results every night.
And it's not doc, it can work as pseudo TP, when outed, but that's it, lookout have no power to save someone, just to redirect kill on someone less important
1 for 1 better than saving someone
so, now lookout becomes bg?
if there's TP allive, it's pseudo TP - scum will be scared to kill important people, without TPs it's bodydouble at best - scum just kills lookout. To go 1 for 1 you need guess "safe" kill, but then we in WIFOM zone - what if scum kills someone you supposed to protect on assumption you're WIFOMing?
In your example, Lookout gives useful information and provides a lot of value even in the WCS that is only sometimes slightly worse than the Sheriff and Investigator.
It's that in the BCS Lookout is by far superior to Sheriff and Investigator, as Sheriff and Investigator will always provide fuzzy and uncertain information while Lookout provides incontrovertible proof (because there aren't any Ninjas or Hiders in ToS FM).
In fact, the Sheriff and Investigator's results can potentially be negative utility to town whereas Lookout results almost never are (unless you're an idiot and just out your PRs for no reason, but that's not the fault of the role, but the player).
RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:the reason why people think it is weak is because they treat it as a cop rather than a doc
no, it's weak, because it's very situational, while sheriff and invest can give results every night.
And it's not doc, it can work as pseudo TP, when outed, but that's it, lookout have no power to save someone, just to redirect kill on someone less important
1 for 1 better than saving someone
so, now lookout becomes bg?
if there's TP allive, it's pseudo TP - scum will be scared to kill important people, without TPs it's bodydouble at best - scum just kills lookout. To go 1 for 1 you need guess "safe" kill, but then we in WIFOM zone - what if scum kills someone you supposed to protect on assumption you're WIFOMing?
In your example, Lookout gives useful information and provides a lot of value even in the WCS that is only sometimes slightly worse than the Sheriff and Investigator.
It's that in the BCS Lookout is by far superior to Sheriff and Investigator, as Sheriff and Investigator will always provide fuzzy and uncertain information while Lookout provides incontrovertible proof (because there aren't any Ninjas or Hiders in ToS FM).
In fact, the Sheriff and Investigator's results can potentially be negative utility to town whereas Lookout results almost never are (unless you're an idiot and just out your PRs for no reason, but that's not the fault of the role, but the player).
It's not about BCS or WCS, but about average results. You can't say X role is better, because sometimes it can perform better, while other times it's much worse. How many times you have got no results with lookout? Or you just see some random town visits?
And if you get fuzzy results with invest/sheriff, git gud maybe?
RAmcius wrote:how to determine, if visit was from town and not scum PR? And i like how "not visited" very likely to be scum
also, i like how you "know" my record and just fact that you think win record matters says a lot about you, so yes, git gud
Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:how to determine, if visit was from town and not scum PR? And i like how "not visited" very likely to be scum
also, i like how you "know" my record and just fact that you think win record matters says a lot about you, so yes, git gud
who cares, you found PR, very good
the fact of the matter is that lookout provides better value when played optimally than all other TI, and a skilled player will be able to get a hit a lot more often than average
RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:how to determine, if visit was from town and not scum PR? And i like how "not visited" very likely to be scum
also, i like how you "know" my record and just fact that you think win record matters says a lot about you, so yes, git gud
who cares, you found PR, very good
the fact of the matter is that lookout provides better value when played optimally than all other TI, and a skilled player will be able to get a hit a lot more often than average
wow, you learn that someone isn't cit, and witch can mess with it too by forcing cit to visit.
a skilled player, yes, but most people aren't that skilled, so lookout roll in general is worse than sheriff/invest
UzayAltay wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:how to determine, if visit was from town and not scum PR? And i like how "not visited" very likely to be scum
also, i like how you "know" my record and just fact that you think win record matters says a lot about you, so yes, git gud
who cares, you found PR, very good
the fact of the matter is that lookout provides better value when played optimally than all other TI, and a skilled player will be able to get a hit a lot more often than average
wow, you learn that someone isn't cit, and witch can mess with it too by forcing cit to visit.
a skilled player, yes, but most people aren't that skilled, so lookout roll in general is worse than sheriff/invest
Witch cant force a non-visiting role to visit .
RAmcius wrote:UzayAltay wrote:RAmcius wrote:Exacerbated wrote:RAmcius wrote:how to determine, if visit was from town and not scum PR? And i like how "not visited" very likely to be scum
also, i like how you "know" my record and just fact that you think win record matters says a lot about you, so yes, git gud
who cares, you found PR, very good
the fact of the matter is that lookout provides better value when played optimally than all other TI, and a skilled player will be able to get a hit a lot more often than average
wow, you learn that someone isn't cit, and witch can mess with it too by forcing cit to visit.
a skilled player, yes, but most people aren't that skilled, so lookout roll in general is worse than sheriff/invest
Witch cant force a non-visiting role to visit .
are you sure about it? I'm pretty sure i asked about it long ago and was told that witch force cit to visit
Exacerbated wrote:I also wouldn't be telling someone with a much better record than you to "git gud" either.
Kmenx wrote:Exacerbated wrote:I also wouldn't be telling someone with a much better record than you to "git gud" either.
Not to offend you Exa but win record doesn't mean jack shit yeah you are a good player but dota2reporter had a
6 0 wL record
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests