Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
Vanquisher101 wrote:Also what are the opinions on hypoclaiming and douse claims?
Vanquisher101 wrote:Lol I have caught up to the posts and have decided to not do what I just did. XD
/Unvote
Vanquisher101 wrote:Also what are the opinions on hypoclaiming and douse claims?
Vanquisher101 wrote:Actually the reason behind not claiming doused is so that the mafia might kill a doused person. This would result in one less scum death which would give us that one extra vote we might require to win. I would suggest that we say all that happened to us EXCEPT the douses unless we know that there is a roleblocker in our role list.
Player | Votes | Voters |
---|---|---|
# | Votes Until Majority |
TheWabbit wrote:There's like four days left. As much as it may feel lighthearted, one may find it intriguing that there are an amount of people who will softclaim/hardclaim PR.
Without such a brilliant explanation, it might be best to avoid defending someone else, since we may assume that you two are working in tandem, thus making you two suspicious. Let's not get cantankerous immediately.
Additionally, we shouldn't really claim doused if we do get doused sometime later, until a presumed Escort has been detected roaming around the night, providing frustration to those who tried to make ends meet during night.
Player | Votes | Voters |
---|---|---|
# | Votes Until Majority |
Jezz92 wrote:Vanquisher101 wrote:Actually the reason behind not claiming doused is so that the mafia might kill a doused person. This would result in one less scum death which would give us that one extra vote we might require to win. I would suggest that we say all that happened to us EXCEPT the douses unless we know that there is a roleblocker in our role list.
So if we are doused we just say 'slept peacefully'?
It's not a bad idea. I never thought of that.
OllyRenard wrote:So why are you guys trying to quick lynch HeyThere again?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests