Town of Salem Game Forums

and how would that help?

There are no wills in this game. If you died, then it would have just confused everyone. Nobody knows what Gob was thinking, right?

Santa07 wrote:

ronit wrote:I slept peacefully.

I don't think I would say Arckas is scum right now, he was quite pro-town yesterday. Also if he was mafia it would be a good play for him NOT to claim he was witched as that would tell the witch that he is mafia. I wouldn't jump too conclusions just yet.
Gob was just messing about, he told everyone he would fakeclaim a role in the episode before the episode even began.

Why wouldn't the witch want to know he's mafia?

You don't speak ronit, do you?

I think this is what he meant: in better words. Arckas probably isn't scum, because he said he was witched. If he were scum he wouldn't say he was witched for he can let the witch know he is scum.

I really don't like how Retral stated his response to the Escort contention.

Cmitc, you should be more careful about how you word things.

Gob could have gone any number of routes with that claim, and speculation at this moment of time on it is silly.

Honestly, Retral, by far, seems the scummiest out of everyone here. I'm fairly certain they're mafia because they keep trying to sloppily cover up Gobln's mistakes rather than to allow their own actions to speak for them.

Swordsworth wrote:Gob could have gone any number of routes with that claim, and speculation at this moment of time on it is silly.

What number of routes would he have gone?

hippophant wrote:I slept peacefully.

Arckas wrote:Controlled by a witch AND roleblocked.

Really not helping your case here, bud.

what does this post mean


Also, Retral's reason for not saying he wasn't escort on D1, is a bit flimsy. Why did you go along with Gobln's gambit if you didn't know what he was doing?

Arckas wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:Gob could have gone any number of routes with that claim, and speculation at this moment of time on it is silly.

What number of routes would he have gone?

Actually being Escort, being a town investigative in order to prevent roleblocks, a Mafia support to guarantee the same thing, etc etc

Again, not worth the speculation until we know more pertaining to Retral.

Personally I don't know how to feel about Retral. Like, when Gob claimed, he literally said he wanted to change the flow of the game because he didn't like how it was going. So, like, it's not even like he was being that shadowy with his intentions. But on the other hand, what does it accomplish? I'm really hoping he knew, since he didn't even push it as a point of discussion, so it's not like it even changed the flow of the game that much...? Surely he'd know that people would pounce on him D2.

Still not exactly sure what's happening with the logic here, but I'm not ready to immediately discount Retral as scum,

Swordsworth wrote:Gob could have gone any number of routes with that claim, and speculation at this moment of time on it is silly.

Wha

What.

How exactly is speculation over Gobln's actions 'silly' when Retral's entire defense right now seems to be based around Gobln's actions?

leyva45 wrote:

hippophant wrote:I slept peacefully.

Arckas wrote:Controlled by a witch AND roleblocked.

Really not helping your case here, bud.

what does this post mean/quote]

No kills and he claimed roleblocked. I had assumed people would be all like 'Arckas is probably scaucsmaa sadwjfnkasnf scum!' instead of being calm and understanding of the whole thing, so the 'case' thing really doesn't apply anymore.

Swordsworth wrote:

Arckas wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:Gob could have gone any number of routes with that claim, and speculation at this moment of time on it is silly.

What number of routes would he have gone?

Actually being Escort, being a town investigative in order to prevent roleblocks, a Mafia support to guarantee the same thing, etc etc

Again, not worth the speculation until we know more pertaining to Retral.

Dude, I'm asking you what your thoughts were because you're the one who said that. I'm not asking Retral for anything or to give me anything. You are the one whom I'm asking.

I'd be fishing if I was asking Retral. You are the one I'm asking, so crying "fish" doesn't really apply, now does it? So please, explain your reasoning.

Arckas wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:

Arckas wrote:

Swordsworth wrote:Gob could have gone any number of routes with that claim, and speculation at this moment of time on it is silly.

What number of routes would he have gone?

Actually being Escort, being a town investigative in order to prevent roleblocks, a Mafia support to guarantee the same thing, etc etc

Again, not worth the speculation until we know more pertaining to Retral.

Dude, I'm asking you what your thoughts were because you're the one who said that. I'm not asking Retral for anything or to give me anything. You are the one whom I'm asking.

I'd be fishing if I was asking Retral. You are the one I'm asking, so crying "fish" doesn't really apply, now does it? So please, explain your reasoning.

There's ∞ reasons he'd be doing this, depending on what role Retral is. End of discussion.

Hippophant, the fact that he's using it as a defense is what's worth looking into. "lel shrug" is not enough.

Arckas, it's not for now, it's for later. That is, if Retral says what I expect him to say.

OH GOD OKAY I REREAD MY DAY START MESAGE AND I'M STRESSED AND I'M PRETTY SURE I HAVE SEMI-RELEVANT INFORMATION THAT RELATED TO SOMEONE PROBABLY(???) BEING SCUM BUT I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE IF I SHOULD REVEAL IT EXACTLY. IS IT FINE IF I SAY IT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO.

Alzar wrote:OH GOD OKAY I REREAD MY DAY START MESAGE AND I'M STRESSED AND I'M PRETTY SURE I HAVE SEMI-RELEVANT INFORMATION THAT RELATED TO SOMEONE PROBABLY(???) BEING SCUM BUT I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE IF I SHOULD REVEAL IT EXACTLY. IS IT FINE IF I SAY IT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO.

if it benefits the town, say it. If it doesn't, or it'll give more harm to the town than it'll benefit us, don't say it.

hippophant wrote:

leyva45 wrote:

hippophant wrote:I slept peacefully.

Arckas wrote:Controlled by a witch AND roleblocked.

Really not helping your case here, bud.

what does this post mean

No kills and he claimed roleblocked. I had assumed people would be all like 'Arckas is probably scaucsmaa sadwjfnkasnf scum!' instead of being calm and understanding of the whole thing, so the 'case' thing really doesn't apply anymore.[/quote]
this post
aaaaaaaa

They could've hit an immune (Arsonist, Serial Killer, Bomber, Witch) It's a dumb idea to suspect that Arckas is the reason scum didn't make a kill right off the bat. Purely because he claimed witch. slight scum.

alzar go look at cute birds and come back in ten minutes

leyva fix your quotes child

o-ok

i need like 5 entire moments becaus e i think this is important so im going to relax

hrlp

leyva45 wrote:They could've hit an immune (Arsonist, Serial Killer, Bomber, Witch) It's a dumb idea to suspect that Arckas is the reason scum didn't make a kill right off the bat. Purely because he claimed witch. slight scum.

I never said I suspected Arckas was the reason scum didn't kill, I said I suspected other people to suspect Arckas was the reason scum didn't kill.

Alzar wrote:o-ok

i need like 5 entire moments becaus e i think this is important so im going to relax

hrlp

there there chick
Spoiler:

hippophant wrote:

leyva45 wrote:

leyva45 wrote:

hippophant wrote:I slept peacefully.

Arckas wrote:Controlled by a witch AND roleblocked.

Really not helping your case here, bud.

what does this post mean

No kills and he claimed roleblocked. I had assumed people would be all like 'Arckas is probably scaucsmaa sadwjfnkasnf scum!' instead of being calm and understanding of the whole thing, so the 'case' thing really doesn't apply anymore.

this post
aaaaaaaa

They could've hit an immune (Arsonist, Serial Killer, Bomber, Witch) It's a dumb idea to suspect that Arckas is the reason scum didn't make a kill right off the bat. Purely because he claimed witch. I have a slight scum because you did this, it seems very opportunistic for scum to do something like this.


I FIXED IT I THINK

I slept peacefully.

Alzar wrote:OH GOD OKAY I REREAD MY DAY START MESAGE AND I'M STRESSED AND I'M PRETTY SURE I HAVE SEMI-RELEVANT INFORMATION THAT RELATED TO SOMEONE PROBABLY(???) BEING SCUM BUT I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE IF I SHOULD REVEAL IT EXACTLY. IS IT FINE IF I SAY IT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO.

Um. Depends on what you think might be right. If the situation deems it necessary, then do it. Only do anything if you feel confident.



I'm on the supermarket rn, gonna reply to some things in a sec. Phone-posting is being r00d.

p-edit:

Alzar wrote:o-ok

i need like 5 entire moments becaus e i think this is important so im going to relax

hrlp

pats birb

go rek some weenies in torn, it's relaxing

hippophant wrote:

leyva45 wrote:They could've hit an immune (Arsonist, Serial Killer, Bomber, Witch) It's a dumb idea to suspect that Arckas is the reason scum didn't make a kill right off the bat. Purely because he claimed witch. slight scum.

I never said I suspected Arckas was the reason scum didn't kill, I said I suspected other people to suspect Arckas was the reason scum didn't kill.

You told Arckas it wasn't helping his case???

OK I'M JUST GOING TO GO AHEAD AND SAY THAT I THINK LEYVA45 IS SCUM (??)

I'M SPY, MAFIA VISITED LEYVA TWICE AND RETRAL ONCE, THERE IS NO 4TH VISIT

I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT SPY IS FOR I HAVEN'T PLAYE RD ANKED TOS IN A YEAR

leyva45 wrote:

hippophant wrote:

leyva45 wrote:They could've hit an immune (Arsonist, Serial Killer, Bomber, Witch) It's a dumb idea to suspect that Arckas is the reason scum didn't make a kill right off the bat. Purely because he claimed witch. slight scum.

I never said I suspected Arckas was the reason scum didn't kill, I said I suspected other people to suspect Arckas was the reason scum didn't kill.

You told Arckas it wasn't helping his case???

'Case' in the sense I had assumed others would make a 'case' out of him being roleblocked. What part of this is so hard to understand?