Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
Cyantic wrote:deferentsheep wrote:Cyantic wrote:Same offer applies to you, Def.
suggestion to vote retral or just any vote because you can change votes onto other wagons too? and no fuck off i'm more stubborn than you
retral is euphoria
Nah. One vote on Retral is easily as good as three. No point anymore.
Swordsworth wrote:That you're right on. Just checking.
Elastoid, what do you think of Neasans insofar?
Swordsworth wrote:Well, how refreshing. /s
Too many conspiracy theories are roaming my head right now. What remains constant is that I don't trust this Met-Retral interaction.
VonAntarctic wrote:Yeah, that's what I just cannot make up my mind about.
Considering the post confuses the heck out of me, it may be due to my not-so-great knowledge in English but I'm not even sure how does that explain stuff when it's literally just responding to deferent and than 'No point anymore'. Can you make your motives more clear?
Elastoid wrote:VonAntarctic wrote:Yeah, that's what I just cannot make up my mind about.
Considering the post confuses the heck out of me, it may be due to my not-so-great knowledge in English but I'm not even sure how does that explain stuff when it's literally just responding to deferent and than 'No point anymore'. Can you make your motives more clear?
Is this a veiled accusation or a request for clarification?
That is to say, are you suspicious of Cy's motives, here, or are you just trying to understand a strategy he's employing?
Elastoid wrote:But since you asked me first, I am anxious to hear more about this anonymous message she got. I'd expect she's likely to attempt to scumread based on it, and find the culprit... but as there are no wills, I'd be more comfortable if she'd post the message in its entirety for all of our perusal. At least, if that's legal -- I assume it is, but if there's a rule against it, feel free to let me know
VonAntarctic wrote:I don't think quoting a moderator message is allowed, but paraphrasing is 100% without penalty so that must be the word you are looking at.
Neasans wrote:Paraphrased: they said green or red and asked me which I was, claimed to be grey, then said I needed them too.
Tbqh I'm more inclined to think they're an older player since I hadn't even posted in the thread once so I can't think of any reason for them to have messaged me unless they know me from other games.
Neasans wrote:Paraphrased: they said green or red and asked me which I was, claimed to be grey, then said I needed them too.
Tbqh I'm more inclined to think they're an older player since I hadn't even posted in the thread once so I can't think of any reason for them to have messaged me unless they know me from other games.
RetralMega wrote:Neasans wrote:Paraphrased: they said green or red and asked me which I was, claimed to be grey, then said I needed them too.
Tbqh I'm more inclined to think they're an older player since I hadn't even posted in the thread once so I can't think of any reason for them to have messaged me unless they know me from other games.
Me, Met, Cow, Von, Cy, and maybe Swords are suspects then? Or are there others who may know you from past games?
VonAntarctic wrote:Yeah, that's what I just cannot make up my mind about.
Considering the post confuses the heck out of me, it may be due to my not-so-great knowledge in English but I'm not even sure how does that explain stuff when it's literally just responding to deferent and than 'No point anymore'. Can you make your motives more clear?
VonAntarctic wrote:Alright, I'm back.
The fact someone asked Neasans about wheter she is Town, Scum or Neutral (basing this off the colours), gives us two options - Either we are 6 v 2 v 1, which would be the most likely if the message is from Mafia or Neutral Evil, or Mafia is trying to decieve us into thinking there is a Neutral, making this 6 v 3. I think 6 v 2 v 1 is more likely. The fact the person said they are Gray seems odd to me, because it can be truly a Neutral or a Mafia pretending to be Neutral.
Retral's claim is pretty bold but dumb at the same time (yeah, you just gave everyone including scum info that you have a strong role). That is, unless their passive is so almighty as they say. Currently, I'm in with Metrion that lore-wise the stuff fits. Also it doesn't seem to be that strong, like some have mentioned.
Cyantic's push on Retral has pretty much done nothing because Retral forgot that spoilers exist. However, the information gained from it about people is interesting. Cyantic is aggressive, and strikes me oddly with his joke, or the fact that he refuses to requote a simple question for Shortsword while claiming answer was contradictory. Also his aggressiveness was immediate ever since he came here. I'm not sure what to make out of this yet, - he's been looking too much on certain people, pushing one to other, but I don't find that as alignment-indicative whatsover.
Retral however wasn't an innocent angel either. I feel he overreacted to Cyantic's accusations and immediatly made a scum read out of it, also he suddenly claimed for no reason, another odd thing. As I said, their claim, however, makes next to no sense for any Mafia member, because that would attract so much attention to them in instant + Retral for sure knows that Cyantic is aggressive.
Metrion's posts seem mostly fine, only one thing I'm questioning:Metrion wrote:Arc/Zeus, you're not going ro pull a bastard game mechanic out of no where are you? I assume not but you went through great detail of everything else and I'd rather not be caught with my pants down.
Why were you worried about this?
I'm not sure what to say about the rest as of now, but I'm working on it.
Elastoid wrote:Neasans wrote:Paraphrased: they said green or red and asked me which I was, claimed to be grey, then said I needed them too.
Tbqh I'm more inclined to think they're an older player since I hadn't even posted in the thread once so I can't think of any reason for them to have messaged me unless they know me from other games.
They said you needed them, as well?
That's an odd thing to say if they don't know your role.
TheCow wrote:/vote von
Nes looks scummy
deferentsheep wrote:i voted you because your post was scummy not because it was hard to read
i didn't ask you for my clinical diagnosis, i asked you for elaboration on stances like "retral is bold and defensive and why did he claim for no reason and he wouldn't make that claim as scum but he could be scum"
VonAntarctic wrote:Honestly I think Cyantic is a little bit more on the scum side than Retral.
I don't think Retral would do what he would as scum.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests