Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
TheCow wrote:Swords, get active or get out :distracted
TheCow wrote:Segaco's crime is one of inactivity. A lynch on Segaco would be a mere policy lynch. The same could be said of many other players. I dislike Santa's tangential address of something he has issue with. This pattern of non-comital dissociation is indeed scummy.
BoS is not active enough to have posted anything alignment indicative at this time. Considering the motivation to post while playing as scum -- be it moderator or player posting -- I do not believe inactivity is a valid scum tell in this game.
TheCow wrote:Segaco's crime is one of inactivity. A lynch on Segaco would be a mere policy lynch. The same could be said of many other players. I dislike Santa's tangential address of something he has issue with. This pattern of non-comital dissociation is indeed scummy.
BoS is not active enough to have posted anything alignment indicative at this time. Considering the motivation to post while playing as scum -- be it moderator or player posting -- I do not believe inactivity is a valid scum tell in this game.
Santa07 wrote:Segaco - tell us why you're town and how you plan to help town.
Do not hardclaim or softclaim a role in any way, and do not refer to night actions or anything.
Swordsworth wrote:You're force-replaced after 36 hours of zero contribution.
I can see what Cow's saying right now with the no lynch; there's no one expressly scummy...except Segaco, now that I'm looking at his posts. Let's go deeper with this.
Segaco, why do you have no reads yet? Why are you so insistent on the way inactives are read? Tell us more about your opinions.
Swordsworth wrote:I'm currently not willing to establish reads with so much inactivity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 188 guests