Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
Nellyfox wrote:What was that, pretzel ?
pretzellover33 wrote:@Nellyfox, don't jump to conclusions so fast. It seems to me almost like you're trying to rush the day with a mislynch. A nolynch isn't as bad as a mislynch and stuff. You did say this is a game based on reads. Somebody that is actually scummy (imo that isn't scummy) could come up.
bumblecow wrote:Ronit has a 1/3 chance of being bad.
And yes, this is my first game.
bumblecow wrote:So, I vote nolynch, and you guys want to lynch, and when I vote to lynch somebody, you say we shouldn't lynch?
ronit wrote:The same odds go 4 everyone else, its the same 4 u as well bumble but i'm not voting u because i dont have any strong evidence, nelly i think the best way to get reads is to ask and answer questons.
bumble to change ur vote u have to say /unvote then u can change it.
bumblecow wrote:So, I vote nolynch, and you guys want to lynch, and when I vote to lynch somebody, you say we shouldn't lynch?
What is this?
I'll rechange my vote to /nolynch.
Permanently.
ronit wrote:nelly i think the best way to get reads is to ask and answer questons.
Nellyfox wrote:I'm not trying for a no lynch, pretzel. I'm just cracking down on the scummy guy and making him talk.
Cause you know discussion and reads and all that.
Nellyfox wrote:ronit wrote:nelly i think the best way to get reads is to ask and answer questons.
Don't got any right now.
Actually.
Hey bumble, why vote Ronit, and not me, who is actually going after you ?
bumblecow wrote:Back to the saying we should lynch again...
bumblecow wrote:Why do you want me to vote you?
Nellyfox wrote:bumblecow wrote:Why do you want me to vote you?
When did I say I wanted you to ?
I'm asking why you voted Ronit instead of me.
bumblecow wrote:Cause we have no leads and you guys are suggesting we random lynch.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests