Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
Neasans wrote:Oh. Hi, there, M4x. ._.
Sorry for last time. ._.
arcthurus wrote:*snip*
M4xwell wrote:Neasans wrote:Oh. Hi, there, M4x. ._.
Sorry for last time. ._.
woof
iggyvolz wrote:arcthurus wrote:*snip*
Usually the mods post vote counts. I'm not sure exactly what their stance is on using the Vote Count format, as someone could theoretically fake the vote counts.
arcthurus wrote:jacobm1122 wrote:That would mean the any is a survivor, as well as the neutral benign.
This is statement is very interesting. Why you think the 2nd survivor would be the any? He could very well be the random neutral.
That's a neutral slip-up in my eyes,if I ever saw any.
Neasans wrote:I considered claiming Survivor in 6B. I wonder how that'd have turned out.
Nellyfox wrote:OMG THE PIE CHART
iggyvolz wrote:I also want to point out right now that I won't take any "you need to vote this guy or you're scum" crap. NO. You don't decide my opinion, I do. If I think he's good, I'll post my reasons. I don't want to have a mislynch because one person guilts the town into voting out of fear of being seen as town. If I have to go up on the gallows for this, I'll cast a vote for myself, because that is what hurts the town the most.
Nellyfox wrote:Also the chart's wrong cause in 4E Sarah was exe
iggyvolz wrote:The point is, history says that we have 2 non-survivors here.
TheCow wrote:Can image spam be kept to a minimum? It uses a lot of data, spoilers or no.
Also, I'm totally an amne. Yep, you caught me :distracted
TheCow wrote:Can image spam be kept to a minimum? It uses a lot of data, spoilers or no.
Also, I'm totally an amne. Yep, you caught me :distracted
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests