SparkingJayYT wrote:Wabbit/3cheers in Wabbits ISO: - First 2 pages no interactions besides Wabbit keeping 3cheers as null - 3rd page only association is calling an interaction between Hello/3cheers v/v - 4th page nothing besides game unrelated talk and Wabbit talking about Uzay's vote on 3cheers. What I find interesting is that they still had 3cheers as null yet didn't question why 3cheers was seen as a Top TR in Poly's readslist:
SparkingJayYT wrote:Wabbit/3cheers in Wabbits ISO: - First 2 pages no interactions besides Wabbit keeping 3cheers as null - 3rd page only association is calling an interaction between Hello/3cheers v/v - 4th page nothing besides game unrelated talk and Wabbit talking about Uzay's vote on 3cheers. What I find interesting is that they still had 3cheers as null yet didn't question why 3cheers was seen as a Top TR in Poly's readslist:
3cheersforidiots wrote:the entire thread is frozen
I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.
think hello or poly.
CFD one of Crimson/dota? or Wabbit, if you want
P-edit: hmm
Crimson/Dota aren't SvS so pretty much 50/50 if there is a scum in them. 2 of the votes on Wabbit are memes, I'd be hesitant on it given I don't have strong reads on either Lemon/Crimson
who do you suggest, then?
I meant I'd be hesitant on it if either Lemon/Crimson's votes were for real reasons, still down for Wabbit unless someone makes a good read here.
their reads are sheepy and the rest of their posts are fluffy I think they did recognise their posting as bad but didn't really make an attempt to improve on it
~Trash
Sophisticatedly unsophisticated Sophie.
Other gamertags are papill0n and luciolebrillant, dependent on game launcher.
their reads are sheepy and the rest of their posts are fluffy I think they did recognise their posting as bad but didn't really make an attempt to improve on it
sheeping is towny if it's obvious
if it's like, not obvious sheeping then yeah (for example voting someone who's been agreed on as the wagon)
Crimson is fine vote. I can't see a reason to scum/town read poly. Objection to hypoclaiming from Wabbit make me think he is Town. But that's weak. From Wabbit/poly I perfer poly.
/vote Crimson
Legacy Season Rank: Master Season One Rank: Master Season Two Rank: Diamond Season Three Rank: Master Season Four Rank: Master
UzayAltay wrote:@Javi can I ask you to spesify (or rephrase) the line about me?
I said no one knows what you're doing because you're picking things to overanalyze that no one else is interested in to make it look like you're doing a lot of work, because no one else would deepen themselves into said things to be sure.
I think you're assuming we have the same context as you when you make a post but we're busy being focused with other stuff that we believe are more important. Why bother that much about a middle bracket, or very specific traits of 3cheers' writing? Even asking me about SFM72 feels somewhat like a forced interaction.
somehow I still doubt that you're scum because what if you're actually being genuine about all of this? (Sorry if you are.) That's probably going to change because of how little day we have left, but idk I got lost by being myself
if the "we" doesn't apply to someone here, say it, i wanna be sure sorry if that was uncalled for, maybe im being small brain
TBH the middle bracket thing was Because it makes it impossible to comment on. Like Idk If my explanation was clear, but Seriously without a clear scheme of reads in readslists, it makes it just impossible to understand. It's standart to not spesify it If amount of lines is odd but at even I just couldn't understand it. For example, somebody made A readslists with 4 brackets ( Dont remember Who atm ). Okay, it is clear #1 is TRs some sort of, #4 is scumreads sort of, What's #2-3? The 3cheers thing was, A Meta read I was holding Because thing I realized and I thought If they are scum clearing people from there might be very useful. Maybe I had better revealed it mid-Day, though I cannot see . That SFM72 question was, I think I asked it shortly after you made A post about that game so I thought it may be A good idea to see your reaction from there.
I meant wabbit's middle bracket, about those reads of who checked in and who didn't, that whole discussion if SFM72 was brought up earlier then fine, but it still felt too convenient to have Also, maybe you should have been more cooperative with the rest of the town about the thing with 3cheers? The point here is that you did that all by yourself.
this is actually gonna come in helpful in determining PoE thank you, dota
anything for you lads
3cheersforidiots wrote:
SparkingJayYT wrote:
3cheersforidiots wrote:the entire thread is frozen
I'd call DADV on whoever is topwagon but I'm not sure on who is actually top.
think hello or poly.
CFD one of Crimson/dota? or Wabbit, if you want
P-edit: hmm
didn't you townread tho weird stuff
personally feel like wagoning wabbit is the same as wagoning cob nobody has any clue wtf his alignment is so it's not exactly the best option
I did, but Sparking's case on Wabbit is tempting
Wait. I may reconsider my read on Wabbit. What's the Sparking's case?
Spoiler:
SparkingJayYT wrote:Wabbit/3cheers in Wabbits ISO: - First 2 pages no interactions besides Wabbit keeping 3cheers as null - 3rd page only association is calling an interaction between Hello/3cheers v/v - 4th page nothing besides game unrelated talk and Wabbit talking about Uzay's vote on 3cheers. What I find interesting is that they still had 3cheers as null yet didn't question why 3cheers was seen as a Top TR in Poly's readslist: [spoiler]
- Later they jot 3cheers as a Townlean with no explanation
Rest of the iso is bland in terms of interactions, chances of w/w is very possible. Tonewise to each other they were consistently casually talking
SparkingJayYT wrote:
TheWabbit wrote:
dota2reporter wrote:
UzayAltay wrote:Dota what? Wabbit's point was "Uzay didnt casted a vote" I casted a vote Like Okay Wabbit has an ego of 999/100 but You should have easily seen they're wrong.
my point's slightly different, i thought voting smilies instead of a player was playing a bit safe
That's what my vote encompasses? The entrance would've been fine with an RVS vote but not actually doing one while attempting to look like you're doing so makes it a terrible entrance.
Besides me not getting why anyone would be a pussy to lay down an RVS vote of all things, why would you pretend to look like you are RVSing as scum when in reality you are aware that you aren't.
This is just reaching from what was only a joke vote.