3cheersforidiots wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:(3cheers / Dota can die)
sounds cool
Your slip is very disingenuous
Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
3cheersforidiots wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:(3cheers / Dota can die)
sounds cool
Hellosither wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:Since Cob didn’t answer my question I’m just going to assume he is new by his recent posts and that it doesn’t resemble noobmafia being coached on how to play, he sounds more lost in thread atm
i get what ur saying but i also feel like i havent seen enough of them to make a significant judgement.
3cheersforidiots wrote:kosmo16 wrote:Hellosither wrote:kosmo16 wrote:/vote Hello
Wagon this. Explanation will come later.
please tell me your trivial explanation. im interested.
No.
NAGL
3cheersforidiots wrote:Hellosither wrote:3cheersforidiots wrote:Hellosither wrote:3cheersforidiots wrote:kosmo16 wrote:Hellosither wrote:kosmo16 wrote:/vote Hello
Wagon this. Explanation will come later.
please tell me your trivial explanation. im interested.
No.
NAGL
what?
Not A Good Look - means kosmo's post doesn't look good on her
oh. i dont find it suspicious, just stupid.
I personally thought it was weird of her to refuse to provide a case when asked by the accused
TheWabbit wrote:polypies73 wrote:{TheWabbit, Crimson97, 3cheersforidiots}
{kosmo16, Jabichuelas, lemonader666}
{dota2reporter, UzayAltay, ScarredSamurai}
{SparkingJayYT, cob709, HelloSither}
explain kosmo, scarred, sparking, and hellosither
3cheersforidiots wrote:ScarredSamurai wrote:TheWabbit wrote:ScarredSamurai wrote:Pretty sure its just Citizens. And Goons are considered "Non Cits" But that doesnt stop them from claiming PR in a 1 for 1. With lack of Vigi in this setup it's gonna be painful dealing with these 1 for 1's.
that's what lynches are for?
vig is likely to fuck over town with hero shooting anyway
Eh, good point. Vigis should always shoot within the PoE to help solve. But im saying we lynch one and shoot the other during the night instead of wasting a day of solving when we can just lynch a lock-scum.
wait, is there a Vigi in the setup?
I'm pretty sure there is no vigi in the setup
don't go confusing me
Hellosither wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:Hellosither wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:Since Cob didn’t answer my question I’m just going to assume he is new by his recent posts and that it doesn’t resemble noobmafia being coached on how to play, he sounds more lost in thread atm
i get what ur saying but i also feel like i havent seen enough of them to make a significant judgement.
They lack any real direction this game, wdym
im saying its too early to make the call that their lack of direction is town indicative imo. theirs a large chance their hypothetical mafia buddies dont dictate much of what theyve said so far.
Crimson97 wrote:Hellosither wrote:so... since im mafia i guess i will vote my self?
/vote Hellosither
Wtf are you doing this game?
UzayAltay wrote:TheWabbit wrote:UzayAltay wrote:TheWabbit wrote:What makes hypoclaiming a good strategy for this setup?
We start with 4 PRs , e.g. 4 Roles that If Mafia cant kill , they'll eithers confirm self or Mafia needs to cc.
Visitors are A bit More compliated Because Mafia claiming there gives 2/1 odds but still , It's unpreferable for Mafia .
The point of hypos are , A citcheck of Neo is locktown.
So even If Mafia manages to kill Neo somehow, that conftowns can hurt them hard.
An example situation to Show that :
D1 citlynch n1 visitorkill d2 citlynch n2 jkkill d3 citlynch n3 neokill -> 4v3 with 2 confcit and 1 visitor.
Cool.
We're not hypoclaiming then.
Why???
Look, I chose an example situation that's bad for us ( Mafia kill PR Each night, cit is lynched every day) but still, end is 33% mechanichal WR.
Hellosither wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:fyi this is the 3cheers slip that feels very disingenuous:3cheersforidiots wrote:ScarredSamurai wrote:TheWabbit wrote:ScarredSamurai wrote:Pretty sure its just Citizens. And Goons are considered "Non Cits" But that doesnt stop them from claiming PR in a 1 for 1. With lack of Vigi in this setup it's gonna be painful dealing with these 1 for 1's.
that's what lynches are for?
vig is likely to fuck over town with hero shooting anyway
Eh, good point. Vigis should always shoot within the PoE to help solve. But im saying we lynch one and shoot the other during the night instead of wasting a day of solving when we can just lynch a lock-scum.
wait, is there a Vigi in the setup?
I'm pretty sure there is no vigi in the setup
don't go confusing me
Beofre that post they acknowledged only 1 KP with this post:3cheersforidiots wrote:TheWabbit wrote:SparkingJayYT wrote:This game is going to be very hard to solve with no kill credits, prepare yourselves.
Ah yes, disabling kill credit when there can only be one kill source.
the horror
i dont see how thats disingenuous, they previously believed there was no vigilante and then had their belief questioned by what ScarredSamurai said. i also dont see how 3cheers as either alignment would benefit by being disingenuous here.
3cheersforidiots wrote:Crimson97 wrote:ScarredSamurai wrote:TheWabbit wrote:poly and dota just ditched the game. Amazing.
I'd be more concerned by how fluffy cob is.
You think they're scum or just don't give a crap?
why not both?
3cheersforidiots wrote:Hellosither wrote:so... since im mafia i guess i will vote my self?
/vote Hellosither
town????
somebody help me
polypies73 wrote:{TheWabbit, Crimson97, 3cheersforidiots}
{kosmo16, Jabichuelas, lemonader666}
{dota2reporter, UzayAltay, ScarredSamurai}
{SparkingJayYT, cob709, HelloSither}
Hellosither wrote:/unvote
SparkingJayYT wrote:v: Cob, Kosmo, Uzay, Poly (??), Samurai
3cheersforidiots wrote:Crimson97 wrote:dota2reporter wrote:UzayAltay wrote:dota2reporter wrote:ok good point, didn't see such a long pause between the first and second post
what about my first point tho
I don't see it.
Like I cant see anyone Who would Do something when I wrote 3cheers cannot Do it Because I wrote instead.
ok you're chill
/unvote
i knew my point was already incorrect from the start since it's just an rvs vote, i just wanted to see your responses
actually yeah, I like this post from Crimson
3cheersforidiots wrote:UzayAltay wrote:Not possible.Jabichuelas wrote:UzayAltay wrote:Crimson97 wrote:UzayAltay wrote:TheWabbit wrote:{Jabichuelas, Hellosither, ScarredSamurai}
{3cheersforidiots, dota2reporter, kosmo16}
{UzayAltay, SparkingJayYT, lemonader666, Crimson97, polypies73, cob709}
top bracket's core
middle are those who haven't checked in
bottom ring is PoE
Bolded are people posted before that post
Not-bolded are people havent posted before that post.
Wabbit?
Why is that important?
(Big)
maybe they didn't talk enough so Wabbit put them there?
Hello had only 2 posts at that moment. I only had 1 .
3cheers , read First page to see How much they have at least.
yeah, but my three posts were completely NAI, as were Hello's posts
you could argue that your own RVS vote was NAI, but there has since been a discussion about it, which means hindsight
3cheersforidiots wrote:TheWabbit wrote:UzayAltay wrote:Hellosither wrote:guys i think im mafia.
umm
What?
w!hellosither → w!uzay
I'd argue this only increases scum equity for Uzay, actually
polypies73 wrote:{TheWabbit, Crimson97, 3cheersforidiots}
{kosmo16, Jabichuelas, lemonader666}
{dota2reporter, UzayAltay, ScarredSamurai}
{SparkingJayYT, cob709, HelloSither}
UzayAltay wrote:polypies73 wrote:{TheWabbit, Crimson97, 3cheersforidiots}
{kosmo16, Jabichuelas, lemonader666}
{dota2reporter, UzayAltay, ScarredSamurai}
{SparkingJayYT, cob709, HelloSither}
Where's nulline of that?
+ Explain Wabbit+Sparking+3cheers pls
Hellosither wrote:kosmo16 wrote:/vote Hello
Wagon this. Explanation will come later.
please tell me your trivial explanation. im interested.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests