Town of Salem Game Forums

JacksonVirgo wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences

I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS

/vote eqsy

Why vote Eqsy out of the blue?

Yeah pls state a reason

Michael's iso ain't look good for him, but he had that in sfm64 as well having no real posts. His reads list is the only that wasn't that bad but that was the only thing I saw that was good on him.

Sorry for lack of activity on my end, was my b'day today so I didn't have much time to post alot, will pick it up tomorrow onwards

Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences

I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS

/vote eqsy

You still think eqsy is scum still from d1? Why so

Xlranet wrote:

watchme1 wrote:Michael's iso ain't look good for him, but he had that in sfm64 as well having no real posts. His reads list is the only that wasn't that bad but that was the only thing I saw that was good on him.

Sorry for lack of activity on my end, was my b'day today so I didn't have much time to post alot, will pick it up tomorrow onwards

bappy hirthday

the readslist shows a tiny bit of gamesense but seeing me at the top of it just negates it in my eyes obviously

Welcome to FM, wim dropping when scum read, wim skyrocketing when town read, mum's spaghetti when null read

Just realised his d1 iso is just him posting rwby memes and fluff and maybe the odd post every 15. He mentions having a mindmeld with Chem but that was about it.

Xlranet wrote:the only acceptable thing i will be scumread for is changing my mind on wagons and being friendly with wabbit

you are scum :^) git gud

Since I am currently unsure, both from my current reads and the conflicting information present I hereby withdraw my vote.

/unvote

JacksonVirgo wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences

I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS

/vote eqsy

Why vote Eqsy out of the blue?

Multi in my opinion it is a TvS and i agree with Jackson why vote me out of the blue you already know my abilities and role and i share a neighborhood chat with Jackson. I am following along with a TvS when it comes to Jay and Debil rn. So why vote me? If anything i should wait a bit since Jackson can infact comfirm me.

Xlranet wrote:i have too much spare time

ask me anything or give me someone to ISO to my limited abilities

You could ISO Wabbit

multi is coasting

/vote multi

watchme1 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences

I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS

/vote eqsy

You still think eqsy is scum still from d1? Why so

They are still utr
Dont like them flipflopping between sparking and debil
Tone during flipflopping sounds fake

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

that's not what i said

this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive

Xlra: wabbit says phone looks good so phone is town
Also xlra: wabbit says eqsy looks bad so eqsy is town

Chemist1422 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

that's not what i said

this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive

Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing

Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1

Xlranet wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

what do you think of michael

That is a slot that i should probably isodive

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

that's not what i said

this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive

Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing

Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1

you were never halfway to being lynched

and no, coasting is only contributing when necessary, which is what you've been doing

Chemist1422 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

that's not what i said

this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive

Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing

Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1

you were never halfway to being lynched

and no, coasting is only contributing when necessary, which is what you've been doing

He kinda was, it was either Seth or Multi got lynched on that day and people decided to pick Seth over Multi.

Chemist1422 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting

/vote multi

I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans

that's not what i said

this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive

Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing

Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1

you were never halfway to being lynched

and no, coasting is only contributing when necessary, which is what you've been doing

No? I'm just posting whatever catches my eyes.
What do you mean by "necessary" anyway

Also considering that this is a maj not a plurality game if i went over halfway i was as good as dead

Flake wrote:i literally don't understand debil's argument

if town transporter existed and was on sparking they would out because it would confirm scum!spark, since trans gives feedback. and if they haven't they are braindead

the only way the argument holds any weight is if there's scum transporter which probably doesn't happen because dumb

why does "because dumb" not hold up otherwise

Xlranet wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:Xlra: wabbit says phone looks good so phone is town
Also xlra: wabbit says eqsy looks bad so eqsy is town

it was one comment for phone lol
to eqsy it was many comments

Your point?

Flake wrote:

Chemist1422 wrote:

Flake wrote:i literally don't understand debil's argument

if town transporter existed and was on sparking they would out because it would confirm scum!spark, since trans gives feedback. and if they haven't they are braindead

the only way the argument holds any weight is if there's scum transporter which probably doesn't happen because dumb

why does "because dumb" not hold up otherwise

what do you mean

scum transporter just isn't nearly as likely as town transporter

what i'm saying is

why is it not a possibility everyone is just dumb and sparking is scum

I isoed michael and i hate their iso until their most recent posts. Early on 80% of their iso is either meme or flavour argument. They never have any real conviction on their reads and when asked they just threw out some reads with no reasoning.

Now in their recent posts they've been commenting on the debil v sparking thing. Their argument here is fair and certainly holds water, though I'd argue that its possible for town!debil to reach this conclusion in their chain of reasoning and that it isnt necessarily scum!debil pulling bs argument to lynch sparking.

That last paragraph is addressed to all debil voters btw

Overall michael can be null-scum
I'd like them to explain the reads they posted earlier

Xlranet wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:

Xlranet wrote:

Multiuniverse wrote:Xlra: wabbit says phone looks good so phone is town
Also xlra: wabbit says eqsy looks bad so eqsy is town

it was one comment for phone lol
to eqsy it was many comments

Your point?

my point is the one comment would have been just making up a TR which couldve made them sus if they died, or giving them towncred for defending them later
i know the singular comment wouldnt be making a scumbuddy look good because i was here
but the unnessisary shade that eqsy and jackson got did not look like bussing at all. he couldve just ignored them or joined in with townreading eqsy but instead he was putting his neck out to pushing eqsy

And why do you think wabbit wouldnt bus eqsy

Flake wrote:what i dont understand is

if there was a role blocker on spark

why would they role block spark of all people, like, irrespective of the role blocker's alignment

because dumb