JacksonVirgo wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences
I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS
/vote eqsy
Why vote Eqsy out of the blue?
Yeah pls state a reason
Moderators: Varanus, FM Game Moderators
JacksonVirgo wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences
I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS
/vote eqsy
Why vote Eqsy out of the blue?
Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences
I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS
/vote eqsy
Xlranet wrote:watchme1 wrote:Michael's iso ain't look good for him, but he had that in sfm64 as well having no real posts. His reads list is the only that wasn't that bad but that was the only thing I saw that was good on him.
Sorry for lack of activity on my end, was my b'day today so I didn't have much time to post alot, will pick it up tomorrow onwards
bappy hirthday
the readslist shows a tiny bit of gamesense but seeing me at the top of it just negates it in my eyes obviously
Xlranet wrote:the only acceptable thing i will be scumread for is changing my mind on wagons and being friendly with wabbit
JacksonVirgo wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences
I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS
/vote eqsy
Why vote Eqsy out of the blue?
Xlranet wrote:i have too much spare time
ask me anything or give me someone to ISO to my limited abilities
watchme1 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Debil's case rests on circumstantial evidences
I find it pointless to continue to vote in this supposed TvS
/vote eqsy
You still think eqsy is scum still from d1? Why so
Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans
Chemist1422 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans
that's not what i said
this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive
Xlranet wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans
what do you think of michael
Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans
that's not what i said
this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive
Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing
Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1
Chemist1422 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans
that's not what i said
this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive
Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing
Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1
you were never halfway to being lynched
and no, coasting is only contributing when necessary, which is what you've been doing
Chemist1422 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:multi is coasting
/vote multi
I just dont want to lynch sparking based on circumstantial evidence, my scumread is more confident on eqsy than any of the 3 parties involved in blackajack shenanigans
that's not what i said
this is actually a wolfy response because it feels really defensive
Isnt coasting like
Not getting involved in the main thing
Also yes I totally shouldnt be defensive about getting voted especially when i nearly got lynched D1
you were never halfway to being lynched
and no, coasting is only contributing when necessary, which is what you've been doing
Flake wrote:i literally don't understand debil's argument
if town transporter existed and was on sparking they would out because it would confirm scum!spark, since trans gives feedback. and if they haven't they are braindead
the only way the argument holds any weight is if there's scum transporter which probably doesn't happen because dumb
Xlranet wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Xlra: wabbit says phone looks good so phone is town
Also xlra: wabbit says eqsy looks bad so eqsy is town
it was one comment for phone lol
to eqsy it was many comments
Flake wrote:Chemist1422 wrote:Flake wrote:i literally don't understand debil's argument
if town transporter existed and was on sparking they would out because it would confirm scum!spark, since trans gives feedback. and if they haven't they are braindead
the only way the argument holds any weight is if there's scum transporter which probably doesn't happen because dumb
why does "because dumb" not hold up otherwise
what do you mean
scum transporter just isn't nearly as likely as town transporter
Xlranet wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Xlranet wrote:Multiuniverse wrote:Xlra: wabbit says phone looks good so phone is town
Also xlra: wabbit says eqsy looks bad so eqsy is town
it was one comment for phone lol
to eqsy it was many comments
Your point?
my point is the one comment would have been just making up a TR which couldve made them sus if they died, or giving them towncred for defending them later
i know the singular comment wouldnt be making a scumbuddy look good because i was here
but the unnessisary shade that eqsy and jackson got did not look like bussing at all. he couldve just ignored them or joined in with townreading eqsy but instead he was putting his neck out to pushing eqsy
Flake wrote:what i dont understand is
if there was a role blocker on spark
why would they role block spark of all people, like, irrespective of the role blocker's alignment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests