woahah wrote:im on pro-pronouns but you're the one who used mansplain so this is on you
fuck
woahah wrote:im on pro-pronouns but you're the one who used mansplain so this is on you
kyuss420 wrote:wow this thread still going? and they said it wouldnt cause any drama...
Villagerlover wrote:Yeah why not.
It's just another fun aesthetic to mess around with, and I like changing up my interface often to keep ToS fresh. I'm sure there are plenty of others who do the same thing.
Anyone who thinks it's anything more than simple aesthetics is absurd.
/support
Brilliand wrote:I seem to have completely skipped over the question of whether players should be allowed to pick a pronoun that doesn't match their skin. So, on that topic... I don't see the point. It wouldn't be very bad for that to be available, but I think it would annoy me if I noticed it at all, and I think it's the wrong solution to the problem it's trying to solve. (See above for what I think the right solution is.)
Villagerlover wrote:Brilliand wrote:I seem to have completely skipped over the question of whether players should be allowed to pick a pronoun that doesn't match their skin. So, on that topic... I don't see the point. It wouldn't be very bad for that to be available, but I think it would annoy me if I noticed it at all, and I think it's the wrong solution to the problem it's trying to solve. (See above for what I think the right solution is.)
I agree that it's totally not okay to have the pronoun completely customizable cause I don't want to see a reportable/offensive name/slur get killed by mafia. It's stupid. It just allows more exploitation.
However, it's fine to have a set amount of pronouns completely customizable as long as they're limited within that range.
But look man. If it annoys you that I want to give a male skin a "she" pronoun in my game for the hell of it, then that's your problem. There is a certain freedom regarding aesthetics that would be fun for a lot of people. Myself included.
There are no "problems" to solve at all, it is simply more aesthetics to have fun with.
Villagerlover wrote:But look man. If it annoys you that I want to give a male skin a "she" pronoun in my game for the hell of it, then that's your problem.
For people like me who randomize their skins, the name I choose is far more important than the skin I get. If I name myself “Miles Edgeworth”, I want the pronouns to be male, regardless of what skin RNG happens to give me.Brilliand wrote:I seem to have completely skipped over the question of whether players should be allowed to pick a pronoun that doesn't match their skin. So, on that topic... I don't see the point. It wouldn't be very bad for that to be available, but I think it would annoy me if I noticed it at all, and I think it's the wrong solution to the problem it's trying to solve. (See above for what I think the right solution is.)
CultureOfCritique wrote:No. The pronouns in-game are for your chosen character, not you. It would make no sense having a character show with the incorrect pronouns, which is why they've been fixed as bugs when it's been spotted before (such as Crusader showing as female).
Basically this. Who your "in-game character" is depends more on your name and role than your skin, especially if you randomize your skins like a lot of players do.Brilliand wrote:That's the way it works right now, but it also makes perfect sense that a real-life girl might want to keep being referred to as "she" despite dressing up in that awesome Crusader costume.CultureOfCritique wrote:No. The pronouns in-game are for your chosen character, not you. It would make no sense having a character show with the incorrect pronouns, which is why they've been fixed as bugs when it's been spotted before (such as Crusader showing as female).
It's not like your skin is what your in-game character actually is - that's determined by your role card (which is secret, and may never be show to other players if you're i.e. cleaned or petrified).
MysticMismagius wrote:Basically this. Who your "in-game character" is depends more on your name and role than your skin, especially if you randomize your skins like a lot of players do.Brilliand wrote:That's the way it works right now, but it also makes perfect sense that a real-life girl might want to keep being referred to as "she" despite dressing up in that awesome Crusader costume.CultureOfCritique wrote:No. The pronouns in-game are for your chosen character, not you. It would make no sense having a character show with the incorrect pronouns, which is why they've been fixed as bugs when it's been spotted before (such as Crusader showing as female).
It's not like your skin is what your in-game character actually is - that's determined by your role card (which is secret, and may never be show to other players if you're i.e. cleaned or petrified).
Because I want the pronouns to match my name, and that doesn’t always happen.Yemac wrote:But why does it matter if your pronoun is randomised if your skin is also randomised? If you want your pronoun to be matching your gender, why would skin not be a problem?MysticMismagius wrote:Basically this. Who your "in-game character" is depends more on your name and role than your skin, especially if you randomize your skins like a lot of players do.Brilliand wrote:That's the way it works right now, but it also makes perfect sense that a real-life girl might want to keep being referred to as "she" despite dressing up in that awesome Crusader costume.CultureOfCritique wrote:No. The pronouns in-game are for your chosen character, not you. It would make no sense having a character show with the incorrect pronouns, which is why they've been fixed as bugs when it's been spotted before (such as Crusader showing as female).
It's not like your skin is what your in-game character actually is - that's determined by your role card (which is secret, and may never be show to other players if you're i.e. cleaned or petrified).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests