UnknownFox wrote:Perhaps the vest could be rewarded between those who vote Innocent, much in the way the Jester only punishes those who vote guilty?
Dwern wrote:The survivor IS infact a neutral role, and no one has any reason to kill it. But at the same time, it is purely random whether he is chosen or not. Not every person who claims survivor is infact a survivor.
Dwern wrote:Also, if i hang you forcefully and end your life, will you be thankful, even though you wanted to survive, and out of happiness and thankfulness, you give me a vest? If you aren't some kind of good-willed philanthropist, that's the most absurd thing I've ever heard.
Dwern wrote:Posing a threat is one way, but it doesn't fit the name "survivor".
Also the lynch + giving vest is flawed since if an inv finds the survivor, they will lynch him on purpose, and it might happen a LOT of times. Trust me, you'd be depressed if I told you how many selfish people I run into in-game.
Dwern wrote:Overall survivor is a pretty good role, since it does give a more realistic feel to the game. Not to mention the tactical thinking of WHEN to use a vest? Will you use it first night? Will you use it the night after you told everyone you were survivor? will they test if you are by killing you? will they wait the first 3 nights for you to use up your vests? etc etc
mouthyexpert wrote:When you claim to be a survivor, you're not trying to protect yourself from lynchings, you're trying to protect yourself from being murdered. There's no reason an investigator would need to corroborate it to begin with.
The fact remains that revealing yourself immediately and refusing to vote for anyone is probably the surest way to win as a survivor, and that's really dumb and boring. If you think playing a survivor is fun, you've got some weird ideas about what fun is.
mouthyexpert wrote:When you claim to be a survivor, you're not trying to protect yourself from lynchings, you're trying to protect yourself from being murdered. There's no reason an investigator would need to corroborate it to begin with.
The fact remains that revealing yourself immediately and refusing to vote for anyone is probably the surest way to win as a survivor, and that's really dumb and boring. If you think playing a survivor is fun, you've got some weird ideas about what fun is.
Dwern wrote:If an inv doesn't double check, he's dumb
kenshila wrote:I love the survivor tbh. I just find him NOT stressing ahaha. I can be anyone's ally, I can help the town, or give my vote to the mafia. I can point out the lies the mafia/SK tells or just cover them. It's another way to play the game. A really free way to play, you don't spend the night times stressing out wondering whether you're going to die or not, and that's a good thing lol.
I enjoy choosing my side, usually town, sometimes SK. It's all about guessing who's what, not in an aggressive I WANT TO KILL YOU way, just in a "oh, that lie isn't too bad, I might use it again next time" way. I just love it.
The survivor is my favourite role, and please don't change it. Survivor has to survive, just let him survive ahaha
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests