Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Joacgroso wrote:This could be bad if the person on the stand was a jester, though it can be easily fixed by making the jester unable to haunt and also denying them the win. The only problem is that this would give gamethrowers the power to easily cause a misslynch. But I guess they can do it anyway, so this is fine.
ScarfVendetta wrote:Joacgroso wrote:This could be bad if the person on the stand was a jester, though it can be easily fixed by making the jester unable to haunt and also denying them the win. The only problem is that this would give gamethrowers the power to easily cause a misslynch. But I guess they can do it anyway, so this is fine.
If I recall correctly, Jesters are already unable to haunt if they leave.
They definitely won't receive a win for their statistics. The only issue is that leaving early also prevents you from receiving a loss, which renders the W/D/L ratio inaccurate.
Yemac wrote:Joacgroso, how would that be bad if the person on the stand is a jester? It doesn't auto-lynch. have you read the post? They're saying if exe's target leaves while on the stand, exe wins, even if that person get's inno'd off. If the person gets guiltied, exe wins, if they get innod, exe loses. This does nothing to increase gamethrowers or mislynches. It merely counts it a win for exe?
I don't understand where the confusion lies here.
Situation now:
Person (exe target) get's voted up
Person leaves.
Town inno's.
Exe does not get win
Situation suggested:
Person (exe target) get's voted up
Person leaves.
Town inno's.
Exe wins
Ayame01 wrote:Yeah, I think those who are voted up and leave should just be auto lynched. Not fair to exe, and I see no reason why it could be a bad idea. It's advantageous to town when an evil DCs. They just vote inno and vote someone else up. It could save time too by skipping the voting part/last words.
Can anyone think of a reason why this could be bad?
Joacgroso wrote:I feel like I went from Light Yagami to Keiichi Maebara.
Joacgroso wrote:Yemac wrote:Joacgroso, how would that be bad if the person on the stand is a jester? It doesn't auto-lynch. have you read the post? They're saying if exe's target leaves while on the stand, exe wins, even if that person get's inno'd off. If the person gets guiltied, exe wins, if they get innod, exe loses. This does nothing to increase gamethrowers or mislynches. It merely counts it a win for exe?
I don't understand where the confusion lies here.
Situation now:
Person (exe target) get's voted up
Person leaves.
Town inno's.
Exe does not get win
Situation suggested:
Person (exe target) get's voted up
Person leaves.
Town inno's.
Exe wins
I was replying to this:Ayame01 wrote:Yeah, I think those who are voted up and leave should just be auto lynched. Not fair to exe, and I see no reason why it could be a bad idea. It's advantageous to town when an evil DCs. They just vote inno and vote someone else up. It could save time too by skipping the voting part/last words.
Can anyone think of a reason why this could be bad?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests