Town of Salem Game Forums

Cirque wrote:Tbh I have no motivation to play FM anymore haha
I might either replace out of this game or finish it and take a break for awhile

Cirque wrote:I didn't think you guys wanted another vote, sorry
/vote Elusive

ElusiveBelle wrote:Cirque was just here, not voting would also warrant a shot later.
If not at least a check, don't like the passiveness there either.

Yo Schultz, what do you actually think of Cham?
Lets hear your mind here since it is clear that one wagon has to be scum driven at this point.

LOLingHyena wrote:/vote Cham
People on Elusive's wagon, convince me why I should switch my vote.

LOLingHyena wrote:

ElusiveBelle wrote:Town shouldn't ever leave it to RNG, even if it's on me town needs to make a choice.
Make a stance and stop sitting on the fence.

Regardless Cham needs to flip by tomorrow, hold Hyena accountable to that and no exceptions.
Especially with how the wagons are going at a tie.

No, I'm not going to leave it at a tie. I'm going to place a vote. Don't worry.

ElusiveBelle wrote:Not even confident enough to try and sway anything, interesting.
Not that it matters.

Flip Cham regardless by tomorrow, if it's red you know at least one of them is defending Cham.

EdwardMidford wrote:I will at least stick up for Elusive in 1 way here.
There are many Disney fans.
Therefore it is possible that Elusive is telling the truth about just knowing the names.
Not having them as fakeclaims.

However, I cannot discount the option that some of those may have been fakeclaim names.
I have quite a null read on Elusive.
While on the outside, if I pretended I had no prior Disney knowledge, it would be wolfy to me.
I also know that (Despite that I couldn’t name quite so many), I too would be able to name quite a lot of those characters.

ElusiveBelle wrote:

verdance wrote:dont feel like talking to elusive/pkr

lets lynch them instead

You're cute, sit on the sidelines the big kids are talking.
Or is this an attempt at a pocket? :thinking:
A poor one mind you if it is.

But yes Jord claimed TP when they were being voted on D1, they didn't go into more detail though and I would recommend not doing so other than character name.
May as well get the flavour in since the others have as Nala and Rafiki respectively.

Varanus wrote:

kosmo16 wrote:I wasn't in condition to post much, but I will catch up today.

@Varanus what's happened with your playstyle? In games we played together you were always not that active and majority of your posts were sarcastic.

Sometimes things are just that important

I actually don't know where my wim came from

LOLingHyena wrote:

Schultz128 wrote:

qwertyuiopl wrote:

LOLingHyena wrote:Claudia, when you get a chance, can you talk to me a bit about how you feel about Qwerty?

Why don't you talk to me about how you feel about qwerty?

wolfy

Really? I read that incredibly towny just based on the assertiveness.

qwertyuiopl wrote:

LOLingHyena wrote:Claudia, when you get a chance, can you talk to me a bit about how you feel about Qwerty?

Why don't you talk to me about how you feel about qwerty?

qwertyuiopl wrote:I just realized that rustic, the last standard game w/ a closed role list, rustic, had one neutral and no nk. Oofie.
Olly who do you think is the least and most scum of your second group?

Varanus wrote:

ElusiveBelle wrote:

Varanus wrote:lulnope

Any role used in a Standard or Vanilla game, and any modification thereof, is fair game.

Is there something in play that you know that we don't Var? :thinking:
As far as I can tell there is no reason not to keep it as a possibility.

bE cArEfUl GuYs
ThErE MiGhT bE vAmPiReS

Spoiler: