Town of Salem Game Forums

Varanus wrote:This is a relevant post

lucky333123 wrote:

Watt2015 wrote:Claim time?
Fine, I'm.. A civ :') My least favorite role.

What is your flavor name?

Varanus wrote:By giving subgroups of targets the next day for them to tell us who it was by their kill

Varanus wrote:Instead of actually giving SK a target, I'll give them a list of people to choose from. That way, lookout can't pull any shenanigans, and I won't accidentally ask them to kill themselves.
Still will leave a large number of players for mafia to attack in while insuring no cross kills.

TheParanoidAndroid wrote:OwO

Varanus wrote:I'm down for a mass claim

Varanus wrote:18 players alive. Counting kills that can be done, and then adding on known confirmable roles.

Me/2RBers -> 3
Ryan lynch (D2) -> 4
Haunt/Vig/Maf/SK kills (N2) -> 8
Lynch (D3) -> 9
Vig/Maf/SK kills (N3) -> 12
Lynch -> 13

Leaving 5 slots that wouldn't be "checked", assuming best case scenario with all attacks killing. Hitting an immune target that isn't bomber would complicate things greatly.

ZSSDistortion wrote:

Watt2015 wrote:

ryanyb wrote:mfw watt goes from "how do I fm I don't really do shit d1 ignore me my reads are shit"
to that.

Coolio, but that vote went without explanation.
You must not know how I play then huh? I'm not an "early game" master who can pull a read out my ass.
Plus, last time Short pulled this shit on me, he was scum, so I have my reasons to be suspicious you salt shaker.

ANYWAYS, uncertain if we discussed this, but what if the Double killed the Bomber last night?

wouldn't the bomber countdown just stop? Pretty sure it only keeps going if the original bomber is still alive.

ryanyb wrote:mfw watt goes from "how do I fm I don't really do shit d1 ignore me my reads are shit"
to that.

ShortcutButton wrote:

ryanyb wrote:

ShortcutButton wrote:/vote watt

Ryan we'll give you your win when the bomber is dead

Mela your reads are bad

can you fucking not

okay we wont give you your win

also.

why would you ever do this, var/htg/whoever else? this proves nothing, and does nothing unless a miracle happens.

ElusiveBelle wrote:I buy the guiltless vigilante thing, that sounds like something Schultz would do. Same with the Exe thing actually and that would complete the wheelhouse of neutrals which is good to know. Allegedly anyways, more than 4 neutrals would sound like overkill. 14v4v4 or 13v5v4 I would assume?

If we're going on people whom would keep off the wagon or out of kill range I would say
Moon, Var, Watt, Ice, Mel, and myself clearly but that would be debatable to others.

Also I would say for Ryan not to vote themselves for this, that takes up one of the voting slots that we can use to make sure another person is on the wagon.

ryanyb wrote:k ig ill be your happy little guilt kill.

Varanus wrote:I didn't actually roll Dio, don't forget. We got to pick our character.
I requested to have whoever nobody else chose, and that was Dio.

And we're changing the plans, ryan. Your claim makes you better to lynch than shoot.

ryanyb wrote:please ill never join a game with you again

Spoiler:

ryanyb wrote:

Watt2015 wrote:

Bottlenose wrote:scum want to be in the best situation as possible after the bomber is dealt with. we can't be sure that they follow us and kill whoever we want them to kill

Can't be 100% they will, maybe not tonight, but if it comes down to do or die.. Who knows?

And do you really want to rely on giving scum a "who knows" chance at being protown

Bottlenose wrote:scum want to be in the best situation as possible after the bomber is dealt with. we can't be sure that they follow us and kill whoever we want them to kill

Bottlenose wrote:

Watt2015 wrote:I think it'd be in everyone's best interest if scum attacked Ryan tonight.

Yea, we COULD lose a Member of T-Team, but in the same regards, we may out the Bomber, both of which Scum team needs to eliminate anyways.

Just food for thought.

that's what i was thinking it's just comes down to our situation and if scum want to cooperate.