Also, scrap most of my reads.
Only use them if you're really really hard pressed for something.
I'll be reworking them tonight.
Return to: [Newcomer FM] NFM46 | Game Over (Mafia Win!)
chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:That's how it'd go if we're judging everyone based on my meta.
But you're judging a few people based on your meta and not others. So you're a hypocrite.
chitownmvp01 wrote:lemonader666 wrote:chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA confirmed hypocrite.
what
He's reading some people based on how he plays and not others.
chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA confirmed hypocrite.
lemonader666 wrote:Your meta doesn't line up with anyone else STAA.Protect me for freelo since i'm also STAA
STAA wrote:chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:Par being Town btw Chit, is based on my own metaand the fact that he's my alt
What?
In your reads, you said I was scum because I thought you were scum, and Par was town.
I think Par is Town, because he's acting like me. It's stupid, but I honestly believe he's Town.
That's a really bad reason to town read someone. There aren't 17 STAAs in the game and thank god there aren't.
No, but atbestworst, yea totally worst case scenario, 15.
I wanna see that game now. 17 mes in one game.
chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:Par being Town btw Chit, is based on my own metaand the fact that he's my alt
What?
In your reads, you said I was scum because I thought you were scum, and Par was town.
I think Par is Town, because he's acting like me. It's stupid, but I honestly believe he's Town.
That's a really bad reason to town read someone. There aren't 17 STAAs in the game and thank god there aren't.
chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:Par being Town btw Chit, is based on my own metaand the fact that he's my alt
What?
chitownmvp01 wrote:lilpup618 wrote:Hell yeah I want to.
Scummy post. Town should want to maximize discussion time. We're not even halfway into the 120 hours yet. Most lynches early don't come before the final 24, even 12 hours of the daylilpup618 wrote:Btw if you get lynched and roll town, I'm going for parallax. He helped bring your slips to my attention. I will also take the blame and won't mind getting lynched myself.
1. This feels very agendyish. Mislynch me then mislynch Parallax.
2. Parallax was okay with getting lynched too. Are you and Parallax the same person? Lol
chitownmvp01 wrote:Did your friend actually give you advice?
chitownmvp01 wrote:STAA wrote:Varanus wrote:what
Chit is scum according to their meta. When they're Town, their ISO isn't fluff/useless shit. It's actually productive. Chit currently has posted the most, and most of it, is just fluff.
Chit is scum. If they flip Town, I'll be surprised.
I don't think you've read my ISO. Give me an exact number for fluff posts.
chitownmvp01 wrote:Parallax7 wrote:TL;DR:
I accuse him of being Witch (for reaction puposes), when he defended someone who was scummy.
Chit retaliated aggressively, and basically said he was right and not scummy, because he had been here the longest.
I respond to his logical fallacy, and continue to call him witch.
The issue here is, I accused him for a test, and responded by voting me, and saying I was wrong and he was right because he had more experience; which doesn't equate to being right. If Steven Hawking says apples are squares, it isn't true.
Anyways, after everyone sheeped him, he's continuously attempted to deflect the scummyness on me; who caught him defending scummy people.
Let's see here:
Chit defended scummy people,
Attacked me,
Continuous fire control by defecting blame,
-I used Zink's meta to consider that Zink could be bad town doing the role fish
-If you think I'm scummy for defending scummy people, does that mean that anyone that disagrees with your reads is scum?
-I'm not wrong about settling for a PL being anti town. I voted you when I called you out on it.
-I have attacked you because I think you're scum. Why shouldn't I push my scum reads?
-Idk what you're talking about with the fallacy and defecting blameVaranus wrote:Parallax7 wrote:TL;DR:
I accuse him of being Witch (for reaction puposes), when he defended someone who was scummy.
Chit retaliated aggressively, and basically said he was right and not scummy, because he had been here the longest.
I respond to his logical fallacy, and continue to call him witch.
The issue here is, I accused him for a test, and responded by voting me, and saying I was wrong and he was right because he had more experience; which doesn't equate to being right. If Steven Hawking says apples are squares, it isn't true.
Anyways, after everyone sheeped him, he's continuously attempted to deflect the scummyness on me; who caught him defending scummy people.
Let's see here:
Chit defended scummy people,
Attacked me,
Continuous fire control by defecting blame,
He didn't defend scummy people
He was right
He didn't use a fallacy
People aren't sheeping him, they're sheeping you
GTFO
THANK YOU
Varanus wrote:what