Uhmmm wrote:Uhmmm wrote:shapesifter13 wrote:Be sure to read the original post fully everyone
Your friends have to make a real money purchase for them to be counted because of the abuse of the old system.
I still don't believe that the old system really had abuse. And I still believe that if you really wanted your Refer-A-Friend system to get actual use, requiring a real money purchase won't work.
If you really wanted to get rid of "abuse" in the old system, here is how you'd do it properly. Require a CAPTCHA whenever creating an account (I don't know if you do this anyways, but still). Then, require that the new account WINS a certain number of games before getting credit. If you require a new account to WIN a certain number of games rather than simply playing a number of games, theoretical bots wouldn't be able to join games just for a play. I'd suggest 50 games.
Even though I disagree in the first place that bots were joining games and going afk just for referral credit, wouldn't this be a valid solution for the "problem" that keeps the integrity of the game intact?
Shapesifter, if you have any counterarguments I'd love to hear them. Every time I propose something like this, it just gets completely ignored or you go back to the "bots" argument.
Five days, no response. I honestly don't care that you require a real money purchase, but please don't pretend the reason is because you want to combat abuse of the system. The reason is you want money. Which is an okay and completely legitimate reason. But if the devs are serious about wanting to recruit more players to the game, then my solution is better because it motivates people to recruit their friends/people on social media who don't have the money to make real money purchases.
Exactly what i was thinking
Naru2008 wrote:MajesticNobody wrote:So what about people...like me who recommend this game to friends get them to make an account.(they love the game now) so why should i then take an extra effort refer people. It really doesn't do anything but reward people who have extra money to use on games. I like the ten game Limit better. This way everyone is rewarded fairly, if you think about it i could recommend you guys 20 members who play the game all the time, someone else could recommend you two moderately playing users who got the game off steam. Therefor, i did more they got more. My friends look at me like I'm crazy and say stuff like 'Why would i buy it off steam if i can get it free sure they have a welcome pack but i can earn that myself..' So this just confuses me entirely.
It's explained in the OP as well as thoroughly explained throughout the thread.
- Steam is more optimized and stable.
- 10 games was abused by people to get rewards
- Anyone you got referred before the change counted as long as they got 10 games before hand. After that, the new RAF system requirements kick in.
I read completely through the thread but i agree with an earlier comment by Uhmm he said they should have too win 50 games before being rewarded eliminating bots and he also said that this is really a way to get money which i also agree with its okay to want money lots of websites do that but dont say its because you want more people..i doubt that.