Search found 280 matches

Return to: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Kirize12 wrote:
LordofFail wrote:This game in a nutshell:

Image

FurWeebz
FURWEEBZ
WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR PROBLEM YOU INSENSITIVE JERK

He won fair and square, no need to make him feel like shit for playing a good game. -_-


Its a joke from the FM skype chat. Its nothing more then minor banter, I can assure you.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:54 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

This game in a nutshell:

Image
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:46 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Cakez be all like

Image
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:37 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Title: Cakez wins by doing absolutely nothing XD
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:35 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Me to the rest of the Town (replace running with trying)

by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:33 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

oliy wrote:Town this game:
Image


This also applies.



Or this:

by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:18 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

deferentsheep wrote:
LordofFail wrote:Note that I am not salty about losing. SirCakez fully deserved to win.

I am salty at the play of others and that somehow TheCow managed to not get kicked from the game for spam / gamethrowing despite breaking rules 3, 4 and 5.

I am salty at the fact that so many people were just shitting around and not caring about the game. This was one of the least fun FM games I have ever been in because half the time I was yelling at cow or others to actually play the game instead of just shitting around for freelo.

Ultimately they got what they deserved: A well earned loss. Good job guys, you did nothing and we lost?

Is that what you wanted? To lose the game? Because that is gamethrowing.

I am judging you simply on the fm plays that I have seen form you and nothing else. You can claim that other things matter, but that's just diverting away from the point that all you seem to do is post useless vulgarity for the sake of pissing others off. When you start talking about who has obtained freelo more, it's a completely irrelevant topic because we're talking about the fact that your playstyle flips between lurking and fakeclaiming as town to piss others off, and then post gifs with a spinning block of text saying "do it pussy". Literally the only reason that it's the is to provoke others. When you get in an argument about you being a flat out gamethrower, you can't blame it on pro strats or playing civ or shitters or whatever card you want to pull, because it shouldn't have any impact on the topic at hand.


...

Are you sure you're talking about the right person? I have never posted the do it pussy gif. Ever. The only person I have ever seen post that gif is milte.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:12 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Ymirr wrote:Awkward jokes attacking wording aside,

@LoF Your comments about Stella being bomber in 5/7 possible situations was interesting. Do you still think that Stella was the objectively best lynch given the information you had at the time?


Yes. I am not upset with the lynch decision.

As hindsight is 20/20, it is easy to see the patters that would indicate that SirCakez is Bomber, namely that Mafia were all too ready to lynch stella and that stella was not giving any real defence; the Bomber would actually have been trying.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:11 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

I can see where the salt towards stella is coming from; stella went against her win condition opting to try to get the town to lose over getting the bomber to win.

For some reason Mafia have the mentality that if scum wins it is a half win for them. Even though that is 100% false, neutrals are third parties that win if and only if everyone else loses. To a neutral, everybody else needs to die. So while I can understand the "if i cant win as mafia i want town to lose", it is an incorrect mentality to have as it is basically "im salty about losing so i want to make as many people lose as possible because im a salty prick"

Also what is with this title? Boyage isnt even a word lol
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:17 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Hiphoplog wrote:Also LoF it wasn't that Milte was a useless Sheriff. Sheriff was a useless role. There were a total of 4 potential roles that Sheriff could find and only 3 rolled. Sheriff served absolutely no purpose with this setup if there was no Spy. The fact we had a Spy and Sheriff was just basically cancer to the Mafia. But neither of them really could do much against the Neutrals baring the exception that Spy now has a sensor so they can find Neutrals. I think the Sensor could possibly be changed to only see Mafia that voted, but really both Sheriff and Spy are for finding Mafia and they just happened to both role.


True, but Milte was useless regardless of his role. I was moreso saying that Milte was useless in general rather then referring to his specific role; he was a total shitter, not something I would have expected from someone of his experience level.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:53 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

stellaluna wrote:
LordofFail wrote:Cow, whats the next game you plan on joining? Just let me know now so that I will make a note not to join it.

Hey mods can you please allow cow to join as many games as he wants just so he can join them all?


I would rather play in a game with 24 Goblns then with one TheCow.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:53 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

JammySplodge wrote:
Rickdaily12 wrote:First of all, GOOD JOB CAKEZ for being the First Neutral to kill off everyone in an episode!

Arso won Ep. 3


Ep 3 had two NKs and only 15 players, as well as a Jester who got lynched. So there were loads of scum kills that game.

@Rick
I agree. Episodes need more neutrals. At least 4 neutrals. I think that an extra random neutral role should be added, that can role Executioner, Jester, or NK.
And if a Executioner or Jester hardclaims for freelo they get their flair revoked. (Not saying they can never hardclaim, but if they hardclaim early just for freelo then they dont get the flair; it would be at the discretion of the mod)

I think the extra neutral should take the place of a Citizen.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 3:34 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

SirCakez wrote:Cow just didn't do anything on the last day though <.<


He didnt really do anything on any day, even after he was confirmed Town...
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:58 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

ryanyb wrote:
LordofFail wrote:
ryanyb wrote:If you think that's anti town we won't along very well.


Anti-town, by definition, is an act that is against the town's goals, which is to find and eliminate all scum factions.

TheCow was attracting negative attention on himself, thus detracting from the ability of the collective town to effectively scumhunt.

Therefore, cow's actions were, by definition, anti-town.

also I came up with a solution for my cow issue: I simply foe'd him and will ignore his future posts.

This is where we fundamentally disagree. I don't see that type of behavior as anti-town, because I don't feel like it detracts town from accomplishing their goals unless they have the intelligence of a grain of sand. Pretty sure that Cow did more scum-hunting than the vast majority of the rest of the town.


To me, Cow did the exact same amount of scumhunting as the majority of the Town. Namely, none.


Exacerbated wrote:LoF, sometimes attracting negative attention to yourself is an effective scumhunting technique.

It's a common scum-hunting strategy to see who goes for low-hanging fruit or to rock the boat a little bit.


Problem is that after James did his gambit Cow should have realized that all scum would be focused on James and not on him. Especially with how much I was tunnelling him.

Scummy town are a Mafia's best friend because they can take a lynch for them.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:58 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Exacerbated wrote:
LordofFail wrote:Or just to explain your reads in general.

It isnt so much who you think is scum, but why you think they are scum that is important in a scumread and consequently deciding upon a lynch.


Explaining your reads is pro-town, but what is pro-town and what catches scum doesn't necessarily coincide.

There are some situations where keeping reads closer to your chest is more beneficial in finding scum than outing them.


Cow's refusal to explain his reads was not one of those situations. He should have explained his townreads at least.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:52 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

ryanyb wrote:If you think that's anti town we won't along very well.


Anti-town, by definition, is an act that is against the town's goals, which is to find and eliminate all scum factions.

TheCow was attracting negative attention on himself, thus detracting from the ability of the collective town to effectively scumhunt.

Therefore, cow's actions were, by definition, anti-town.

also I came up with a solution for my cow issue: I simply foe'd him and will ignore his future posts.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:52 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Exacerbated wrote:And the fact that people were too lazy to actually make sense of his play and want to auto-lynch him because they don't attempt to understand his play.


What was there to understand? He just shitposted and prod dodged the whole game...

You literally couldn't make sense of his play because he wasn't scumhunting, he was just shitposting and attracting attention onto himself which was an anti-town display.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:48 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Technetium wrote:
LordofFail wrote:
Technetium wrote:*finishes popcorn*
*makes more popcorn*
Want some popcorn?


Is it salty popcorn? ;)

*dumps salt on popcorn*


Imagevia Imgflip Meme Maker
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:45 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Or just to explain your reads in general.

It isnt so much who you think is scum, but why you think they are scum that is important in a scumread and consequently deciding upon a lynch.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:44 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

Technetium wrote:*finishes popcorn*
*makes more popcorn*
Want some popcorn?


Is it salty popcorn? ;)
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:42 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

James2 wrote:
SirCakez wrote:James ffs
Stop fakeclaiming as town


Why? My CFM12 fakeclaim carried that town.

LordofFail wrote:
James2 wrote:Cow was a pro-player. You guys should have listened to him.


No, he wasnt.
And what should we have listened to? He didnt say anything. At all.


He warned you not to lynch Stella. He was right about so much this game.


I dont listen to arguments that have no evidence or reasoning presented with them. If you accuse someone of being scum with no reasons for it, the argument it null and void. When you accuse someone or make a statement or present an idea, you have to give reasoning for it or the idea is worthless.

Its like saying "I think the wall would be better green"
"Why?"
*no answer*

That isnt exactly a convincing argument.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:42 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Day Two (Melted)

Exacerbated wrote:Why was Cow the one of the most accurate players in the game, then?


He wasnt. This is the ONLY reads list Cow posted the entire game.

TheCow wrote:CJBlack44
Lokiben
oliy
RhazhBash
ShortcutButton
stellaluna
RHawkeye
TorqueRxF
Sarah Thorpe
TheCow
Kirize12
JammySplodge
dota2reporter


FirelightKnight
milte345
SirCakez
ladd
LordofFail
James2
PersianRugs


Of his 7 scumreads, the only ones that were actually scum were FirelightKnight and SirCakez.
2/7 isnt all that accurate tbh
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:41 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

parkerparkour wrote:Hi I heard I could laugh at LOF and Sarah
I haven't read the game but I can imagine what happened considering how bad episodes are


Not much to laugh at really. I'm not salty that I lost, I'm just angry at the play of certain individuals who really should have been playing better.

Towards the end of the game it seemed that I was the only one really trying and given that this was an Episode, that was really dissapointing.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:39 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

James2 wrote:Cow was a pro-player. You guys should have listened to him.


No, he wasnt.
And what should we have listened to? He didnt say anything. At all.

All he did was shitpost and fuck around. He made no reads. He posted no opinions. He did not say who to vote or target at night. He only complained that people wanted him to do shit and refused to do anything.

dota2reporter wrote:
James2 wrote:Cow was a pro-player. You guys should have listened to him.

Hearing this from the master of plans isnt very surprising tbh.
Cow wasnt really bad, he was just playing selfish.


He just refused to put any effort into the game at all, expecting everyone else to carry him.
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:38 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964

Re: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)

milte345 wrote:
LordofFail wrote:
Ymirr wrote:I spent hours yesterday reading this thread from scratch. As good as any book I've ever read, and better than most. And people, most of you wouldn't have done much better than they did tbh. Its much easier to make reads when you are not one of the ones playing.


It would be impressive if you manage to do worse :L

milte345 wrote:Definitely didn't try to check Shortcut night 3


Case in point.
>Sheriff
>Inactive to the point that they want to check a dead player

I was hoping you'd respond to this
points to CFM13


You mean the game in which I had no idea what I was doing because I never played Undertale and got really salty at cow? :|
Maybe you meant 8D in which I tried to check someone who was killed earlier but my error was corrected (also a lot was happening in 8D and I was going off my notes kept in my last will which were written the night before and I only updated said notes in my last will during night phases). Also I never checked someone purely randomly, I always checked off a hunch or a scumread...
by LordofFail
Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:36 pm
 
Forum: Game Threads
Topic: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)
Replies: 2968
Views: 286964
Next

Return to: Episode IX | Game Over! (Bomb Boyage)